Effective Monitoring of Hydraulic Fracture Stimulations Using Microseismcity: Part 1, Source Scaling Behavior and Stress Release

References

1. Aberchrombie, R.E.
   (1995). Earthquake source scaling relationships from -1 to 5 ML using seismograms recorded at 2.5-km depth, J. Geophys. Res., Vol 100, No. B12, 24-015-24,036.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aki, K.
   , 1995. Scale dependence in earthquake phenomena and its relevance to earthquake prediction, Proce. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol 93, 3740–3747.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Allmann, B.P. and Shearer, P.M.
   , 2009. Global variations of stress drop for moderate to large earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., Vol 114, B01310.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ardakani, E., Baig, A., Urbancic, T. and Bosman, K.
   , 2018. Microseismicity-derived fracture network characterization of unconventional reservoirs by topology.Interpretation, 6(2), SE49–SE61.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brune, J.
   , 1970. Tectonic stress and spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 4997–5009. Correction in J. Geophys. Res.76, 5002. 1971.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gibowicz, S.J.
   , 1995. Scaling relations for seismic events induced by mining, PAGEOPH, Vol 144, No. 2.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kwiatek, G., Plenkers, K., Dresen, G.Jaguars Research Group
   , and Jaguars Research Group, (2011). Source Parameters of Picoseismicity at Mponeng Deep Gold Mine, South Africa:Implications for Scaling relations, BSSA, Vol 101., No. 6., pp. 2592–2608.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Madariaga, R.
   , 1976. Dynamics of an expanding circular fault, Bull.Seismol. Soc. Am., 66, 639–666.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Stock, C. and Smith, E.C.C.
   , 2000. Evidence for different scaling of earthquake source parameters for large earthquakes depending on faulting mechanism, Geophys. J. Int., Vol. 143, 157–162.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Talebi, S.
    , 1986. Source et propogatiion des emissions sismo-acoustiques engendrees par des injections de fluide dans un massif rocheux, Doctorat de L’universitite Pierre et Marie Curie – Paris VI, 178 pp..
    [Google Scholar]
11. Trifu, C-I., Urbancic, T.I., and Young, R.P.
    , 1995. Source parameters of mining-induced seismic events: An evaluation of homogeneous and inhomogeneous faulting models for assessing damage potential, PAGEOPH (1995) 145: 3
    [Google Scholar]
12. Urbancic, T.I., Trifu, C-I., and Young, R.P.
    , 1993. Microseismicity derived fault-planes and their relationship to focal mechanism, stress inversion, and geologic data.Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 2475–2478.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Urbancic, T.I. and Trifu, C-I
    , 1996. Effects of rupture complexity and stress regime on scaling relations of induced microseismic events, Pure and Appl. Geophys., 147, 319–343.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Urbancic, T.I. and Zinno, R.J.
    , 1998. Cotton Valley Hydraulic Fracture Imaging Project: Feasibility of determining fracture behavior using microseismic event locations and source parameters.1998 SEG Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Urbancic, T.I. and Baig, A.M.
    2015, Rupture Behaviour of Hydraulic Fracture Induced-Triggered Seismicity.77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Madrid, Spain, 1–4 June, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Urbancic, T., Smith-Boughner, L., Crowley, J.W., Viegas, G., Baig, A. and von Lunen, E.
    , 2015. Characterizing the Dynamic Growth of a Fracture Network, Paper URTEC-2154641 in Proceedings of the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 20–22 July.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Viegas, G., Urbancic, T.I., Baig, A.M., and von Lunen, E.
    2015, Rupture Characteristics of –M3 to M1 Hydraulically Induced Seismicity, SEG Annual Technical Meeting, New Orleans, 5302–5306.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Walker, R.N.
    , 1997. Cotton Valley Hydraulic Fracture Imaging Project. SPE 3857715.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Wang, H., Ren, Y., Wen, R., Xu, P.
    , 2019. Breakdown of Earthquake Self-Similar Scaling and Source Rupture Directivity in the 2016–2017 Central Italy Seismic Sequence, JGR Solid Earth, 124, 3898–3917.
    [Google Scholar]