1887

Abstract

Summary

Hydrophobic association polymers and salt-resistant polymers are functional polymers with stronger viscosifying properties than common polymers such as hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM). And both of them can furtherly expand sweep volume to improve oil recovery efficiency. However, the current researches on the two types of polymers are mainly focused on the EOR effect, and there is no in-depth investigation on the differences in their microstructure. In this paper, hydrophobic association polymer HSP and salt-resistant polymer SRP were selected to evaluate, and the differences in microstructure, hydrodynamic characteristic size, migration capacity and enhanced oil recovery were compared. The results show that the HSP has a complex spatial network structure, while the SRP has a rigid coarse-straight chain structure. The HSP has stronger spatial aggregation structure corresponding to larger hydrodynamic characteristic size. Compared with HPAM, both HSP and SRP have higher adsorption retardation rate, causing the resistance coefficient and residual resistance coefficient are larger. The higher flow resistance of spatial network leads to better EOR effect of HSP. Compared with the SRP, the EOR of HSP flooding can be increased by 2.98%.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133099
2021-04-19
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Druetta, P.; Raffa, P.; Picchioni, F.
    , Chemical enhanced oil recovery and the role of chemical product design. Appl Energ2019, 252.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Thomas, S.
    , Enhanced Oil Recovery - An Overviews. Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Revue de l’IFP 2007, 63 (1), 9–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhong, H.; Yang, T.; Yin, H.; Lu, J.; Zhang, K.; Fu, C.
    , Role of Alkali Type in Chemical Loss and ASP-Flooding Enhanced Oil Recovery in Sandstone Formations. SPE-168220-PA2019, Preprint (Preprint), 15.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, J.; Liu, H.
    , A novel model and sensitivity analysis for viscoelastic polymer flooding in offshore oilfields. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 2014, 20 (2), 656–667.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Delamaide, E.; Moreau, P.; Tabary, R.
    , A New Approach for Offshore Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery. In Offshore Technology Conference, Offshore Technology Conference: Houston, Texas, USA, 2015; p 18.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, Z.; Cheng, H.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhuang, Y.
    , Experimental Investigation of Synergy of Components in Surfactant/Polymer Flooding Using Three-Dimensional Core Model. Transport in Porous Media 2018, 126 (2), 317–335.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Co, L.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, Q.; Watts, G.; Zhao, L.; Shuler, P. J.; Tang, Y.
    , Evaluation of functionalized polymeric surfactants for EOR applications in the Illinois Basin. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering2015, 134, 167–175.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dupuis, G.; Rousseau, D.; Tabary, R.; Grassl, B.
    , Flow of Hydrophobically Modified Water-Soluble-Polymer Solutions in Porous Media: New Experimental Insights in the Diluted Regime. SPE-129884-PA 2011, 16 (01), 43–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tamsilian, Y.; Agirre, A.; Fernandez, M.; Sheng, J. J.; Tomovska, R.
    , High-molar mass acrylamide-co-diacetoneacrylamide graft copolymers as viscosity enhancer for polymer flooding oil recovery. Polymer Testing2020, 82.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Willett, J. L.; Finkenstadt, V. L.
    , Starch-poly(acrylamide-co-2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid) graft copolymers prepared by reactive extrusion. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2015, 132 (33), n/a-n/a.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, J.; He, C.; Tao, Z.
    , Experimental study on improving offshore viscous-oil recovery via a viscosity reducer assisted hotwater-injection process. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities 2020, 34 (01), 62–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Candau, F.; Selb, J.
    , Hydrophobically-modified polyacrylamides prepared by micellar polymerization1Part of this paper was presented at the conference on `Associating Polymer’, Fontevraud, France, November 1997.1. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 1999, 79 (2), 149–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Raffa, P.; Broekhuis, A. A.; Picchioni, F.
    , Polymeric surfactants for enhanced oil recovery: A review. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering2016, 145, 723–733.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yamamoto, H.; Tomatsu, I.; Hashidzume, A.; Morishima, Y.
    , Associative Properties in Water of Copolymers of Sodium 2-(Acrylamido)-2-methylpropanesulfonate and Methacrylamides Substituted with Alkyl Groups of Varying Lengths. Macromolecules 2000, 33 (21), 7852–7861.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Adhikary, P.; Krishnamoorthi, S.
    , Synthesis, characterization, and application of amylopectin-graft-poly(AM-co-AMPS). Journal of Applied Polymer Science2012, 126, E312–E317.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Yu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Liang, S.; Tan, S.; Sun, Z.; Yu, Y.
    , Experimental study on surface-active polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery: A case study of Daqing placanticline oilfield, NE China. Petroleum Exploration and Development 2019, 46 (6), 1206–1217.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Rellegadla, S.; Prajapat, G.; Agrawal, A.
    , Polymers for enhanced oil recovery: fundamentals and selection criteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2017, 101 (11), 4387–4402.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Argillier, J. F.; Audibert, A.; Lecourtier, J.; Moan, M.; Rousseau, L.
    , Solution and adsorption properties of hydrophobically associating water-soluble polyacrylamides. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 1996, 113 (3), 247–257.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, P.
    , Study on the flowing property and oil displacement ability of associative polymer in porous media. China: China University of Petroleum in Hua dong, 2013..
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Taylor, K. C.; Nasr-El-Din, H. A.
    , Hydrophobically Associating Polymers for Oil Field Applications. In Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Petroleum Society of Canada: Calgary, Alberta, 2007; p 8.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ding, M.; Han, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, P.; Yuan, Y.
    , Oil recovery performance of a modified HAPAM with lower hydrophobicity, higher molecular weight: A comparative study with conventional HAPAM, HPAM. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry2019, 72, 298–309.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Manichand, R. N.; Seright, R.
    , Field vs. Laboratory Polymer-Retention Values for a Polymer Flood in the Tambaredjo Field. SPE-168220-PA 2014, 17 (03), 314–325.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kamal, M. S.; Shakil Hussain, S. M.; Fogang, L. T.
    , A Zwitterionic Surfactant Bearing Unsaturated Tail for Enhanced Oil Recovery in High-Temperature High-Salinity Reservoirs. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents 2018, 21 (1), 165–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. B, Z. L. A.; B, M. C.; A, X. C.; B, S. H. H.; A, Y. L.
    , Emulsification in a microfluidic flow-focusing device: Effect of the dispersed phase viscosity - ScienceDirect. Fuel283.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Shi, Z. J.; Jia, C. X. Z.; Wang, D. W.; Deng, J.; Xu, G. F.; Wu, C. H.; Dong, M. Y.; Guo, Z. H.
    , Synthesis and characterization of porous tree gum grafted copolymer derived from Prunus cerasifera gum polysaccharide. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.2019, 133, 964–970.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, P.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Cao, X.; Song, X.
    , The effect of microstructure on performance of associative polymer: In solution and porous media. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering2012, 90-91, 12–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Orelovitch, O. L.; Apel, P. Y.; Sartowska, B.
    , Preparation of porous polymer samples for SEM: combination of photo oxidation degradation with a freeze fracture technique. Materials Chemistry and Physics2003, 81 (2-3), 349–351.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, R.; Pu, W.; Sheng, J. J.; Du, D.
    , Star-like hydrophobically associative polyacrylamide for enhanced oil recovery: Comprehensive properties in harsh reservoir conditions. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers2017, 80, 639–649.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Perevyazko, I.; Trützschler, A.-K.; Gubarev, A.; Lebedeva, E.; Traeger, A.; Tsvetkov, N.; Schubert, U. S.
    , Absolute characteristics and conformation of cationic polymers by hydrodynamic approaches: Poly(AEMA-co-MAEMA-co-DMAEMA) copolymers. European Polymer Journal2017, 97, 347–355.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhu, Y.; Gao, W.; Li, R.; Li, Y.; Yuan, J.; Kong, D.; Liu, J.; Yue, Z.
    , The effect of variable fluidity polymer flooding on eOR and its application effect. Acta Petrolei Sinica2018, 39 (002), 189–200, 246.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133099
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133099
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error