1887

Abstract

Summary

Heavy oil reservoirs remain challenging for surfactant-based EOR, particularly in selecting fine-tuned chemical formulations which exhibit high performances and are cost-effective. This paper reports a core-scale laboratory feasibility study, aiming at designing a surfactant-polymer pilot for a heavy oil field with an oil viscosity of ∼500cP in the South of Sultanate of Oman, where polymer flooding has already been successfully trialed. A major driver was to design a simple chemical EOR method, to minimize the risk of operational issues (e.g. scaling) and ensure smooth logistics on the field. To that end, a dedicated alkaline-free and solvent-free surfactant polymer (SP) formulation has been designed, with its sole three components, polymer, surfactant and co-surfactant, being readily available industrial chemicals. This part of the work has been reported in a previous paper. A comprehensive set of oil recovery coreflood tests has then been carried out with two objectives: validate the intrinsic performances of the SP formulation in terms of residual oil mobilization and establish an optimal injection strategy to maximize oil recovery with minimal surfactant dosage.

The coreflood tests performed involved various rock mineralogies and structures: Bentheimer sandstone as model analogues ; artificial sand and clays granular packs with representative mineralogical composition ; native reservoir rock plugs, to validate the injection strategy in fully representative conditions.

Under injection of “infinite” slugs of the SP formulation, all tests have led to tertiary recoveries of more than 88% of the remaining oil after waterflood with final oil saturations of less than 5%. When short slugs of SP formulation were injected, tertiary recoveries were larger than 70% ROIP with final oil saturations less than 10%. The final optimized test on a reservoir rock plug, which was selected after an extensive review of the petrophysical and mineralogical properties of the available reservoir cores, led to a tertiary recovery of 90% ROIP with a final oil saturation of 2%, after injection of 0.35 PV of SP formulation at 6 g/L total surfactant concentration, with surfactant losses of 0.14 mg-surfactant/g(rock). Further optimization will allow accelerating oil bank arrival and reducing the large PV of chase polymer needed to mobilize the liberated oil.

These outcomes validate, at lab scale, the feasibility of a surfactant polymer process for the heavy oil field investigated. As there has been no published field test of SP injection in heavy oil, this work may also open the way to a new range of field applications.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133121
2021-04-19
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-AbriK., Al-MjeniR., Al-BulushiK., Al-AzriN., Al-RiyamiO., Al-RajhiS., TeeuwisseS., GhulamJ., Abu-SheikhaI. and DoumaS.
    : “Reducing Key Uncertainties Prior to a Polymer Injection Trial in a Heavy Oil Reservoir in Oman”, SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, SPE-169686-MS (2014) https://doi.org/10.2118/169686‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/169686-MS [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-JabriR., Al-MjeniR., Al-AzriN., RousseauD., RenardS., MirallesV. and DelamaideE.
    : “Experimental Study of Surfactant Polymer for a Heavy Oil Field in South of Oman”, SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, SPE-190418-MS (2018) https://doi.org/10.2118/190418‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/190418-MS [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-MurayriM.T., HassanA.A., Al-AjmiN.A., WartenbergN., DelbosA., SuzanneG.
    : “Methodology to Improve Techno-Economic Viability of Surfactant-Flooding in a Shallow Sandstone Heavy Oil Reservoir”, SPE International Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition, SPE-193665-MS (2018) https://doi.org/10.2118/193665‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/193665-MS [Google Scholar]
  4. ArensdorfJ., KerrS., MinerK. and Ellis-ToddingtonT.
    : “Mitigating Silicate Scale in Production Wells in an Oilfield in Alberta”, SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, SPE-141422-MS (2011) https://doi.org/10.2118/141422‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/141422-MS [Google Scholar]
  5. BaeJ.H. and PetrickC.B.
    : “Glenn Pool Surfactant Flood Pilot Test: Comparison of Laboratory and Observation-Well Data”, SPE Reservoir Engineering1 (06): 593–603, SPE-12694-MS (1986) https://doi.org/10.2118/12694‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/12694-PA [Google Scholar]
  6. BaeJ.H. and SyedE.U.
    : “Glenn Pool Surfactant Flood Pilot Test: Part 2 - Field Operations”, SPE Reservoir Engineering3 (03): 771–777, SPE-15551-MS (1988) https://doi.org/10.2118/15551‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/15551-PA [Google Scholar]
  7. BorahM.T. and GregoryM.D.
    : “A Summary of the Big Muddy Field Low-Tension Flood Demonstration Project”, SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, SPE-17536-MS (1988) https://doi.org/10.2118/17536‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/17536-MS [Google Scholar]
  8. Delamaide, E
    : “Is Chemical EOR Finally Coming of Age?”, SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Virtual, SPE-202276-MS (2020) https://doi.org/10.2118/202276‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/202276-MS [Google Scholar]
  9. DelamaideE.
    : “Investigation on the Impact of Voidage Replacement Ratio and Other Parameters on the Performances of Polymer Flood in Heavy Oil Based on Field Data”, SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, SPE-185574-MS (2017) https://doi.org/10.2118/185574‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/185574-MS [Google Scholar]
  10. DelamaideE., BazinB., RousseauD. and DegreG.
    : “Chemical EOR for Heavy Oil: The Canadian Experience”, SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, SPE-169715-MS (2014) https://doi.org/10.2118/169715‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/169715-MS [Google Scholar]
  11. DelamaideE., RousseauD., WartenbergN. and SalaunM.
    : “Surfactant Polymer (SP) vs. Alkali-Surfactant Polymer (ASP): Do We Need the A in ASP?”, SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, SPE-204611-MS (2021)
    [Google Scholar]
  12. FerrellH.H., KingD.W. and SheelyC.Q.Jr.
    : “Analysis of the Low-Tension Pilot at Big Muddy Field, Wyoming”, SPE Formation Evaluation, 3 (02): 315–321, SPE-12683-PA (1988) https://doi.org/10.2118/12683‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/12683-PA [Google Scholar]
  13. HocineS., MagnanA., DegréG., RousseauN. and RousseauD.
    : “New Insights on Chemical EOR Processes for Heavy Oil”, SPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada, Calgary, SPE-170143-MS (2014) https://doi.org/10.2118/170143‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/170143-MS [Google Scholar]
  14. HunterK., McInnisL., Ellis-ToddingtonT. and KerrS.
    : “The Use of Modeling and Monitoring to Control Scale in Alberta ASP Floods”, SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, SPE-165285-MS (2013) https://doi.org/10.2118/165285‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/165285-MS [Google Scholar]
  15. KangX. and ZhangJ.
    : “Surfactant Polymer (SP) Flooding Pilot Test on Offshore Heavy Oil Field in Bohai Bay, China”, SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, SPE-165224-MS (2013) https://doi.org/10.2118/165224‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/165224-MS [Google Scholar]
  16. LiZ., ZhangA., CuiX., ZhangL., GuoL., ShanL.
    : “A Successful Pilot of Dilute Surfactant-Polymer Flooding in Shengli Oilfield”, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, SPE-154034-MS (2012) https://doi.org/10.2118/154034‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/154034-MS [Google Scholar]
  17. McInnisL.E., HunterK.D., Ellis-ToddingtonT.T. and GrawbargerD.J.
    : “Case Study of the Taber Mannville B ASP Flood”, SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, SPE-165264-MS (2013) https://doi.org/10.2118/165264‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/165264-MS [Google Scholar]
  18. RodriguezF., RousseauD., BekriS., HocineS., DegreG., DjabourovM. and BejaranoC.A.
    : “Investigation and Interpretation of a Novel Surfactant-Polymer Approach to Increase Extra-Heavy Oil Recovery: Application to a Thin-Bedded Reservoir, Faja Petrolifera Del Orinoco, Venezuela”, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, SPE-179624-MS (2016) https://doi.org/10.2118/179624‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/179624-MS [Google Scholar]
  19. RousseauD., BekriS., BoujlelJ., HocineS. and DegreG.
    : “Designing Surfactant-Polymer Processes for Heavy Oil Reservoirs: Case Studies”, SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, Calgary, SPE-189745-MS (2018) https://doi.org/10.2118/189745‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/189745-MS [Google Scholar]
  20. TayA., OukhemanouF., WartenbergN., MoreauP., GuillonV., DelbosA. and TabaryR.
    : “Adsorption Inhibitors: A New Route to Mitigate Adsorption in Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery”, SPE Asia Pacific Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, SPE-174603-MS (2015) https://doi.org/10.2118/174603‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/174603-MS [Google Scholar]
  21. WatsonA., TrahanG.A. and SorensenW.
    : “An Interim Case Study of an Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer Flood in the Mooney Field, Alberta, Canada”, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, SPE-169154-MS (2014) https://doi.org/10.2118/169154‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/169154-MS [Google Scholar]
  22. WartenbergN., KerdraonM., SalaunM., Brunet-ErrardL., FejeanC. and RousseauD.
    : “Evaluation and Optimization of Adsorption Reduction Strategies on Chemical EOR Economics”, International Petroleum Technology Conference, IPTC-21810-MS (2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. WidmeyerR.H., WilliamsD.B. and WareJ.W.
    : “Performance Evaluation of the Salem Unit Surfactant/Polymer Pilot”, Journal of Petroleum Technology40 (09): 1217–1226, SPE-14442-PA (1988) https://doi.org/10.2118/14442‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/14442-PA [Google Scholar]
  24. YoussefS., MascleM., VizikaO.
    : “High Throughput Coreflood Experimentation as a Tool for EOR Project Design”, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, SPE-190166-MS (2018) https://doi.org/10.2118/190166‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/190166-MS [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133121
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133121
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error