1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. 11th Congress of the Balkan Geophysical Society
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

We use constant velocity migration of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) sections over a predefined range of migration velocities for the validation of diffraction focusing, using local slopes distribution, with the scope to estimate a migration velocity model. We avoid the user dependent diffraction analysis to circumvent subjectivity and use overlapping x-t windows to retrieve diffraction focusing validation for the entire dataset. The estimated migration velocity is utilized as an attribute whose sensitivity in water variation saturation is tested as a complementary method to the Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) method for the assessment of soil moisture.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202149BGS13
2021-10-10
2024-04-27

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202149BGS13
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bitri, A. and Grandjean, G.
    [1998] Frequency - wavenumber modelling and migration of 2D GPR data in moderately heterogeneous dispersive media. Geophysical Prospecting, 46, 287–301.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Claerbout, J. F.
    [2004] Earth soundings analysis: Processing versus inversion, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Co., Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Clair, St. and Holbrook, W. S.
    [2017] Measuring snow water equivalent from common-offset GPR records through migration velocity analysis. The Cryosphere, 11, 2997–3009.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Dou, Q., Wei, L., Magee, D. R. and Cohn, A.G
    [2017] Real-Time Hyperbola Recognition and Fitting in GPR Data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55, 51–62
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Economou, N
    [2016] Time varying band pass filtering GPR data by self- inverse filtering. Near Surface Geophysics, 14(2), 207–217.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Economou, N., Vafidis, A., Bano, M., HamdanH. and RamirezJ.
    [2020] Ground-penetrating radar data diffraction focusing without a velocity model. Geophysics, 85(3), 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Fomel, S.
    [2002] Applications of plane-wave destruction filters. Geophysics, 67(6), 1946–1960.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamdan, H., EconomouN. and Vafidis, A.
    [2020] Data Adaptive GPR Diffraction Focusing Using Multi-Path Summation. Near surface Geosciences 2020, 26th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, C. and Zhang, J.
    [2021] Velocity Analysis Using Separated Diffractions for Lunar Penetrating Radar Obtained by Yutu-2 Rover. Remore Sensing, 13(7), 1387.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Novais, A., Costa, J. and Schleicher, J.
    [2008] GPR velocity determination by image-wave remigration. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 65(2), 65–72,
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Smitha, N., Ullas Bharadwaj, D. R., Abilash, S., Sridhara, S. and Singh, V.
    [2016] Kirchhoff and F-K migration to focus ground penetrating radar images. Geo-Engineering, 7(4).
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202149BGS13
Loading
Gpr Data Migration Velocity Estimation Using a Local Diffraction Multi-focusing Criterion
Conference Proceedings 2021, 1 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202149BGS13
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202149BGS13
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202149BGS13
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error