Some new Insights on the Correlation of Isoseismal Maps With Terrestrial and Satellite Gravity Data

References

1. AkyilmazO., UstunA., AydinC., ArslanN., DoganalpS., GuneyC., MercanH., UygurS.O., UzM., YagciO.
   [2016] ITU_GGC16 The combined global gravity field model including GRACE & GOCE data up to degree and order 280. GFZ Data Services.
   [Google Scholar]
2. DilalosS.
   [2018]. Application of geophysical technique to the investigation of tectonic structures in urban and suburban environments. A case study in Athens basin. Ph.D. Thesis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 321p. Athens, Greece.
   [Google Scholar]
3. DilalosS. & AlexopoulosJ.D.
   [2017]. Indications of correlation between gravity measurements and isoseismal maps. A case study of Athens basin (Greece). Journal of Applied Geophysics, 140, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.03.012
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.03.012 [Google Scholar]
4. DilalosS., AlexopoulosJ.D., TsatsarisA.
   , [2018]. Calculation of Building Correction for urban gravity surveys. A case study of Athens metropolis (Greece). Journal of applied geophysics, 159, 540–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.09.036
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.09.036 [Google Scholar]
5. FecherT., PailR., GruberT.Goco Consortium
   , Goco Consortium, [2017]. GOCO05c: a new combined gravity field model based on full normal equations and regionally varying weighting. Surveys in geophysics, 38(3), 571–590. Doi: 10.1007/s10712‑016‑9406‑y
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-016-9406-y [Google Scholar]
6. FrommknechtB., LamarreD., MeloniM., BigazziA., FloberghagenR.
   [2011]. GOCE level 1b data processing. Journal of Geodesy, 85(11), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190‑011‑0497‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0497-4 [Google Scholar]
7. InceE.S., BarthelmesF., ReißlandS., ElgerK., FörsteC., FlechtnerF., SchuhH.
   [2019] ICGEM-15 years of successful collection and distribution of global gravitational models, associated services, and future plans. Earth System Science Data, 11(2), 647–674. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd‑11‑647‑2019
   https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-647-2019 [Google Scholar]
8. KouskounaV., GanasA., KleanthiM., KassarasI., SakellariouN., SakkasG., ValkaniotisS., ManousouE., BozionelosG., TsironiV., KaramitrosI., TavoularisN., PapaioannouCh., Bossu, R.
   [2021] Evaluation of macroseismic intensity, strong ground motion pattern and fault model of the 19 July 2019 Mw5. 1 earthquake west of Athens. Journal of Seismology, 25(3), 747–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950‑021‑09990‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-021-09990-3 [Google Scholar]
9. LekkasE.
   [2001] The Athens earthquake (7 September 1999): intensity distribution and controlling factors. Engineering Geology, 59 (3–4), 297–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0013‑7952(00)00119‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00119-8 [Google Scholar]
10. TapleyB., RiesJ., BettadpurS., ChambersD., ChengM., CondiF., GunterB., KangZ., NagelP., PastorR., PekkerT., PooleS., Wang, F.
    [2005] GGM02-An improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE. Journal of Geodesy, 79(8), 467–478. Doi: 10.1007/s00190‑005‑0480‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-005-0480-z [Google Scholar]
11. TzitzirasA., RozosD., VakondiosI., EliasP., KynigalakiM., NikolaouN., KonstantopoulouG.
    [2000] Macroseismic observations from the earthquake of 7/9/99 in Attiki area. Annales Géologiques des Pays Helléniques, Vol. 38, pp. 145–152.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Van der MeijdeM., JuliàJ., AssumpçãoM.
    , [2013] Gravity derived Moho for South America. Tectonophysics, 609, 456–467, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.03.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.03.023 [Google Scholar]
13. YiW., RummelR., GruberT.
    , [2013] Gravity field contribution analysis of GOCE gravitational gradient components. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 57(2), 174–202. http://web.gys.gr/GeoSearch/geoid/hmgs-geoid-index.html
    [Google Scholar]