1887

Abstract

Summary

Image fusion between different types of overlapping data offers significant advantages in archaeological research. For example, it complements the information that exists in images from dissimilar geophysical methods, enhances elusive yet systematic features and can reduce the effect of noisy spurious signals. Such improvements allow the identification of buried structures of archaeological importance with higher accuracy and greater confidence. In this work we use the curvelet transform to combine geophysical images from different modalities to detect possible archaeological targets in Philippi, Northern Greece. We jointly interpret overlapping data from two surveys, one utilizing the method of magnetic gradiometry and another measuring the apparent electrical resistivity. The images show several possible rectangular anomalies whose dominant orientation lies along the azimuths of 0 and 90 degrees which coincide with prior knowledge about this region. We utilize one of the main advantages of the curvelet domain that is the ability to express the imaged features as a function of their orientation and wavelength and we produce fused images that exploit the prior information about dominant building orientations. Our initial results are promising, showing several prominent features and possible excavation targets with sharp rectangular boundaries that possibly depict buried masonry of archaeological interest.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202149BGS53
2021-10-10
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. CandesE. J. and DonohoD. L.
    , 2000. Curvelets - a suprisingly effective nonadaptive representation for objects with edges, in Curves and Surface Fitting. Saint-Malo 1999, A.Cohen, C.Rabut, L.Schumaker (eds.), Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, 105–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. KaramitrouA., BogiatzisP., TsokasG. N.
    , 2019. Fusion between Geophysical and Satellite images for the study of Archaeological sites. Archaeological Prospection, doi: 10.1002/arp.1766.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1766 [Google Scholar]
  3. KaramitrouA., TsokasG. N., PetrouM.
    , 2017. A Pixel-Based Semi-Stochastic Algorithm for the Registration of Geophysical Images. Archaeological Prospection, doi:10.1002/arp.1578.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1578 [Google Scholar]
  4. Lasaponara, R. and Masini, N.
    2007: Detection of archaeological crop marks by using satellite QuickBird multispectral imagery. J. Archaeol. Sci., 34, 214–221. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2006.04.014.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.04.014 [Google Scholar]
  5. Logan, B. F. and Shepp, L. A.
    , 1975: Optimal reconstruction of a function from its projections. Duke Math. J.42, 4, 645–659.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. RadonJ.
    , 1917: Uberdie Bestimmung von Funktionen durch ihere Integralwerte Lags gwisser Mnigfalaltigkeiten. Ber. verchs. Akad.Wiss. Leipzig, Math-Nat.K.I, 69, 269–277.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202149BGS53
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202149BGS53
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error