1887

Abstract

Summary

Heavy rain in May 2014 triggered thousands of landslides in Balkan region. In order to help in overcoming difficult situations, humanitarian expert project was performed by AGES and financially supported by SEG GwB.

The project brought students, researchers and practitioners in Serbia and BiH together with experts - volunteers from seven other countries. They cooperated towards a common goal of geophysical surveys, data analysis and design of countermeasures for landslide disaster mitigation, overcoming the divisive history of wars, race, religion and culture.

But, evaluation of geophysical surveys often accounts for the technical aspects alone, while social, economic and environmental evaluations are rarely discussed in professional societies. The importance of achieving the SDGs is increasing in all the social activities; geophysics is expected to deliver value to the world and that is why geophysical projects should be assessed in terms of social, economic and environmental impacts as in the SDGs.

Among various methods of project evaluation, the Development Assistance Committee of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD-DAC) proposed six evaluation items. These assessment criteria are tools for business evaluation from the perspective of sustainable humanitarian benefits and often involve volunteers across national borders and set standards based on international consensus.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202149BGS59
2021-10-10
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aizawa, T. and Uchida, T.
    [2016] Emergency actions of SEGJ at an occurrence of severe natural disaster: Case study of emergency surveys in Iwaki City after the Great East Japan Earthquake, Butsuri-Tansa, 69, No.3, 161–171. (in Japanese).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Capello, M. A., Shaughnessy, A. and Caslin, E.
    [2021] The Geophysical Sustainability Atlas: Mapping geophysics to the UN Sustainable Development Goals, The Leading Edge, 40, 10–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. KomatinaS., Suto, K. and Urošević, M.
    [2017]. Assessment of flood damaged infrastructures in Bosnia & Herzegovina and Serbia. Final Report. https://data.seg.org/uploads/Bosnia_Herz_Serbia_Landslide_Final_Report_d748c7f0f8.pdf (accessed 11 August 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Development Assistance Committee (OECD-DAC)
    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Development Assistance Committee (OECD-DAC) [2019] Better criteria for better evaluation, https://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/revised-evaluation-criteria-dec-2019.pdf (accessed 11 August 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Takahashi, T., Aizawa, T., Murata, K., Nishio, H. and Matsuoka, T.
    [2015] Permeability profiling on a river embankment with integrated geophysical data (in Japanese), Butsuri-Tansa, 68, No.3, 167–175.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202149BGS59
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202149BGS59
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error