Evaluation of Coulomb Stress Accumulations and Magnitudefrequency (b-value) Distribution for the East Anatolian Region of Turkey

References

1. Bozkurt, E.
   [2001] Neotectonics of Turkey-a synthesis. Geodinamica Acta, 14, 3–30.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Emre, Ö., Duman, T.Y., Özalp, S., Şaroğlu, F., Olgun, Ş., Elmacı, H. and Çan, T.
   [2018] Active fault database of Turkey. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16, 3229–3275.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Frohlich, C. and Davis, S.
   [1993] Teleseismic b-values: Or, much ado about 1.0. J. Geophys. Res., 98(B1), 631–644.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C.F.
   [1944] Frequency of earthquakes in California. B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 34, 185–188.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Nanjo, K.Z., Nagahama, H. and Satomura, M.
   [1998] Rates of aftershock decay and the fractal structure of active fault systems. Tectonophysics, 287, 173–186.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Stein, R.S., Barka, A.A. and Dieterich, J.H.
   [1997] Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering. Geophys. J. Int., 128, 594–604.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Toda, S., Stein, R.S., Sevilgen, V. and Lin, J.
   [2011] Coulomb 3.3 graphic-rich deformation and stress-change software for earthquake, tectonic, and volcano research and teaching-user guide. United State Geological Survey Open-File Report, 2011–1060.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Utsu, T.
   [1971] Aftershock and earthquake statistic (III): Analyses of the distribution of earthquakes in magnitude, time and space with special consideration to clustering characteristics of earthquake occurrence (1). Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Series VII (3), 379–441.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Wiemer, S.
   [2001] A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismological Research Letters, 72(3), 373–382.
   [Google Scholar]