1887

Abstract

Summary

In this research, a machine learning (ML)-based analysis was conducted, using genetic algorithm (GA) to analyse the fracture porosity of a shallow fractured igneous reservoir in the Wichian-buri (WB) sub-basin, Thailand. The GA code was developed in Python, in which the multiple linear regression (MLR) and root mean square error (RMSE) were employed as objective & fitness functions, in addition the genetic operators were set up according to the tournament selection, arithmetic crossover and random resetting mutation. Conventionally calculated fracture porosity values by well log analysis were used to train the GA models, whose performance was evaluated based on the least total prediction error, cost and execution time. Twelve GA models were run for three reservoir intervals, using different well log data (i.e. CAL, GR, RHOB, NPHI, LLM and DT) as the input parameters. It was found that the GA model consisting of 600-training data with 200 population showed the best performance for the target shallow fractured igneous reservoir interval, located from 1,545m to 1,698m deep. The fracture porosity was determined from well log and the GA analyses was found to be from 0 to 0.04.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202177071
2021-11-30
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BarrS. M., CooperM. A. (2013). Late Cenozoic Basalt and Gabbro in the Subsurface in the Phetchabun Basin, Thailand: Implications for the Southeast Asian Volcanic Province. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, pp. 169–184.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Elkewidy, T. I. & Tiab, D., 1998. Application of Conventional Well Logs to Characterize Naturally Fractured Reservoirs with their Hydraulic (Flow) Units. Alberta, Canada, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Holland, J. H., 1992. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. MA, USA: MIT Press Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheusheva, S., 2019. Ablebits.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.ablebits.com/office-addins-blog/2018/08/01/linear-regression-analysis-excel/ [Accessed 3 July 2019].
  5. Saleh, M. H. & Tuama, H. M., 2017. Comparison of Different Types of Fitness Functions to Choose the Appropriate Attributes for Porosity Prediction. Al-Nahrain Journal for Engineering Sciences, pp. 737–743.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Saleh, M. H. & Tuama, H. M., 2016. Novel Multi-Gen Multi Parameter Genetic Algorithm Representation for Attributes Selection and Porosity Prediction. International Journal of Computer Applications, 141(4), pp. 0975–8887.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202177071
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202177071
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error