1887

Abstract

Summary

Integrated geophysical investigations including magnetometric, gravimetric, and 2D Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) surveys were conducted in the Central Fort zone of the Roman archaeological site Romula (Reşca village, Olt County, Romania). This study, sponsored by the Foundation of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG)—Tulsa, OK, USA, was carried out by teams from the University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geology and Geophysics—Department of Geophysics, and from the Geological Institute of Romania—Geohazard Department. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of various geophysical methods under the specific conditions of this site and to provide new information regarding archaeological targets, in addition to the results of a previous ERT survey from 2019 and of the archaeological excavations. The collected magnetometric data show distinct anomalous zones or lineaments with NW–SE and NE–SW orientation, likely reflecting buried Roman structures (building remains, brick walls, brick debris); generally, the identified anomalous magnetic sources correlate well with high resistivity ERT anomalies. Some particularly significant results of the 2020 geophysical survey are the clear delineation of the north-eastern brick wall of the Roman Central Fort and of a possible sewage or drainage channel outside the Fort perimeter.

The main objectives were:

1. Assessing the effectiveness of various geophysical methods under the specific conditions of a multilayered archaeological site;

2. Providing additional or new information regarding Roman archaeological targets, with respect to a previous geophysical survey and archeological excavations.

This investigation mainly contribute sto:

1. Identification of the main archaeological structures orientations (NW–SE and NE–SW) for the Central Fort zone of ancient Romula town by integrated geophysical research;

2. Delineation of the north-eastern brick wall of the ancient town Central Fort zone and of a possible sewage or drainage channel outside the Fort perimeter.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202177075
2021-11-30
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Loke, M.H. [2010] RES2DINV version 3.59—Rapid 2-D Resistivity & IP inversion using the least-squares method. Geotomo Software, Penang, Malaysia, 148 pp., http://www.geotomosoft.com/
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Mărgărit Tătulea, C. [1994] Romula-Malva. Editura Museion, Bucureşti, ISBN 973-95902-5-x.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Negru, M., Gherghe, P. and Amon, L. [2020] Considerations regarding the phases of evolution of the Roman town of Romula, in light of archaeological research at the Central Fortification (2013–2018).Analele Universităţii din Craiova. Istorie, ISSN 1224-5704, Anul XXV, 2(38), 7–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Şerbănescu, A., Negru, M. and Guţică-Florescu, L.G [2020] Geophysical survey and research excavation at Romula—Central Fort. Assessing the effectiveness of ERT results based on the 2019 excavation results.Arhivele Olteniei, Serie nouă, ISSN 1015-9118, 34, 49–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Tudor, D. [1978] Oltenia romană, ed. 4 (Roman Oltenia, 4th edition). Editura Academiei R.S.R., Bucureşti.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Vlădescu, CM. [1986] Fortifcaţiile Romane din Dacia Inferior (Roman Fortifications from Dacia Inferior). Editura Scrisul Românesc, Craiova.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202177075
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202177075
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error