1887

Abstract

Summary

Complementary irrigation is an agronomic practice that consists of applying sheets of water when the soil moisture does not satisfy the water needs of the crop to achieve maximum yields. However, this practice can lead to soil salinization when electrical conductivity of irrigation water exceeds certain limit values. The objective of this work is to determine the efficiency of indicators based on the ECa, measured with proximal sensors, as a rapid characterization of variability of some soil properties under complementary irrigation. INDICATOR ratios were calculated using the apparent electrical conductivity obtained from resistivity and electromagnetic induction measurements in two areas: one under irrigation and another rainfed. Some physico-chemical soil properties measured in laboratory at the same sites were compared with those indicators in the two areas. The indicators using the measurements with the resistivity sensor in soils under irrigation were efficient to determine, rapidly, changes in soil salinity and sodicity due to water application. They were also effective to detect variability in soil humidity when volumetric water content is at least slightly greater in irrigation than rainfed area. The indicator using apparent conductivity from electromagnetic induction measurements was efficient to detect changes in other edaphic properties and their spatial distribution.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202185013
2021-03-11
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Corwin, D.L. and Scudiero, E.
    [2019]. Chapter One: Review of soil salinity assessment for agriculture across multiple scales using proximal and/or remote sensors. In: D. L.Sparks (Editor), Advances in Agronomy, Volume 158, 1–130. Academic Press Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Heilig, J, Kempenich, J, Doolittle, J, Brevik, E.C and Ulmer, M.
    [2011]. Evaluation of Electromagnetic Induction to Characterize and Map Sodium‐Affected Soils in the Northern Great Plains. Soil Survey Horizons, 52:77–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hillel, D
    (Eds). 2013. Advances in irrigation (vol 3). Elsevier, 336 pp
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Page, AL, Miller, R. H and KeeneyD.R.
    [1982]. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd ed. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. SSSA, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 1159 pp
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Torres Duggan, M, Rimski Korsakov, H, Álvarez, C.R. and Lamelas, J.A.
    [2018]. Relevamiento de la calidad de agua para riego complementario en la región pampean. XXVI Congreso Argentino de la Ciencia del Suelo.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Viscarra Rossel, R. A. and Adamchuk, V. I.
    [2013]. Chapter 6: Proximal soil sensing. In MargaretOliver, ThomasBishop, BenMarchant (Eds): Precision Agriculture for Sustainability and Environmental Protection. London, UK: Earthscan. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.2799.1847
    https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2799.1847 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202185013
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202185013
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error