1887

Abstract

Summary

Managing uncertainty in 4D quantitative interpretation is important for calibrating the production data and 4D seismic, pressure-saturation inversion, sim2seis analysis, and closing the loop by Seismic History Matching (SHM). Here we will demonstrate the impact of imaging velocity on the 4D QI and seismic history matching. The uncertainties in the migration velocity model have been assessed based on the 4D imaging scan approach. The seismic history matching was performed using observed seismic (legacy and the seismic data migrated with velocity model refined by 4D image scan approach). The results show a change in saturation with an average of 5–6% over the entire reservoir and 10% around injectors, and also very good improvement in seismic history matching using observed data of the 4D image scan model over the legacy 4D seismic

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202210941
2022-06-06
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chen, G. [2014] Improving 4D seismic Imaging by modifying baseline depth migration velocity model. 76th EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2014, Amsterdam: EAGE
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hatab, M., and MacBeth, C. [2021] Assessing data error for 4D Seismic History Matching: Uncertainties from processing workflow. 82nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2021
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hatab, M., and MacBeth, C. [2021] Assessment of data error for 4D quantitative interpretation. International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, 91st SEG Conference & Exhibition 2021
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202210941
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202210941
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error