1887

Abstract

Summary

We aim to demonstrate that machine learning (ML) can reduce turn-around substantially without sacrificing quality for seismic processing. We show this in the context of velocity model building based on Residual Moveout and focus on two specific elements: gather clean-up and RMO picking. We find that it is critical not only to curate well labelled data, but also to better condition the data as per learning problem requirements. While we optimized the supervised-learning ML networks for training, our results got a substantial boost through the label and data conditioning workflows developed for the problems. When applying on seismic data it was not trained on, the ML networks generalized well not only for other seismic data from the Gulf of Mexico and Brazil but also for deep seismic data from the Black Sea, Nigeria, and Oman. Applying the machine-learning networks reduced turn-around both for gather clean-up and for RMO picking from 1–2 weeks to less than a day. Less time is needed for tuning the workflow, testing parameters, laborious QC and climbing the learning curve. Execution on the compute is also faster. Turn-around for velocity model building was reduced both for a ray-based workflow and for a wave-equation-based workflow.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202211093
2022-06-06
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cadzow, J. A., (1988) Signal enhancement-a composite property mapping algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 36, 49–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Duveneck, E., (2015), A local dip filtering approach for removing noise from seismic depth images, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 4683–4687
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hampson, D., (1986) Inverse velocity stacking for multiple elimination. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1986, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 422–424.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, J., Devarakota, P., Sutton, C., Ye, S. and Webster, P., [2021] AUTOMATCH: A fully automated adaptive subtraction driven by artificial intelligence. First International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, 1360–1365.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rynja, H., Bakker, P., ten Kroode, F., Haneveld, C., Krupovnickas, T., Mitchell, N. and Gerritsen, S., (2019) 3D RTM-based Wave Path Tomography: workflow and application. SEG 89th annual meeting, 1530–1534.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Vamaraju, J., Han, B., Sutton, C., Liu, Z., Rynja, H. and Vila, J., (2021) Deep learning based gather automated processing of migrated gathers for velocity model building. First International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy: (pp. 1530–1534). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202211093
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202211093
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error