1887

Abstract

Summary

This study investigates the caprock quality of Early Jurassic Drake Formation shales drilled in 17 wells in four oil and gas exploration blocks in the Aurora CO2 storage site, the northern North Sea using the Young’s modulus-Poisson’s ratio rock physics template. The template computes theoretical values of dynamic elastic properties of common constituents (e.g., clay, quartz, calcite, and organic matter) and helps characterize caprock behaviors (brittle versus ductile). Results show that the Drake Formation shales in the Aurora area have a wide range of Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio values and behave predominantly ductile to less ductile. Brittleness is a complex function of rock strength, lithology, texture, and control caprock shear failure and fracture potential. The brittleness behavior of Drake Formation shales deviates significantly compared to the classification proposed by . Also, two other elastic property-based brittleness indices suggested by and differ. The studied wells have a wide range of structural depth, explaining the diagenetic variation, hence variable brittleness indices. The discrepancies among the brittleness indices warrant the need for basin-specific or even formation-specific templates if the formation differences are significant.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20224012
2022-04-04
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aker, E., Kjønsberg, H., Fawad, M., Mondol, N.H. [2021]. Estimation of thickness and layering of Johansen and Cook Formation sandstones at the potential CO2 storage site Aurora. SINTEF Proceedings; 7, SINTEF Academic Press, https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2779937.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bretan, P., Yielding, G., Mathiassen, O.M., Thorsnes, T. [2011]. Fault-seal analysis for CO2 storage: an example from the Troll area, Norwegian Continental Shelf.Petroleum Geoscience, 17, 181–192.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Castagna, J. P., Batzle, M. L. and Eastwood, R. L. [1985]. Relationships between compressional- and shear-wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks.Geophysics50, 571–581.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fawad, M., Mondol, N.H. [2021]. Method for estimating rock brittleness from well-log data.Norwegian Patent # 345798, https://patents.justia.com/patent/20210255359.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Grieser, B. and Bray, J. [2007]. Identification of production potential in unconventional reservoirs.SPE paper 106623, 6, https://doi.org/10.2118/106623-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mondol, N.H. [2018a]. Seal quality prediction using E-v rock physics templet-A case study from the Norwegian Barents Sea Extended Abstract, GeoConvention 2018, Calgary, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mondol, N.H. [2018b]. Predicting seal brittleness of hydrocarbon reservoirs using LMR A case study from the Norwegian Barents Sea, EAGE Annual Meeting 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Perez, A. R., Marfurt, K. [2014]. Mineralogy-based brittleness prediction from surface seismic data-application to the Barnett Shale.Interpretation, 2, T255–T271,.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Thompson, N., Andrews, J.S., Wu, L., Meneguolo, R. [2022]. Characterization of the in-situ stress on the Horda platform-A study from the Northern Lights Eos well.International Journal of Green House Gas Control, 114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc2022.103580.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20224012
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20224012
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error