1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. EAGE GeoTech 2022 Sixth EAGE Workshop on CO2 Geological Storage
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

To “substantially reduce global greenhouse gas emissions to limit the global temperature increase in this century to 2 degrees Celsius while pursuing efforts to limit the increase even further to 1.5 degrees” as stated in the Paris Agreement ( ), most greenhouse gas control scenario include massive CO2 geological storage also called CCS. According to the IEA, from over 40 Mtpa CO2 in 2021, CCS yearly capacity needs to increase to 1.6 Gtpa CO2 in 2030 ( ). To make it happen, subsurface industry will have to overcome (amongst other) the following two critical challenges: social acceptance and Monitoring, Measurement and Verification (MMV) as technically and economically viable for long term monitoring (50–100 years) ( ).

In this abstract, pros & cons of frequent full field 4D seismic monitoring strategy are presented, and a supplement/alternative approach is introduced ( ) that capitalize on the key features of CCS to calibrate flow models where and when needed with an agile focused seismic measurement.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20224020
2022-04-04
2024-04-28

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20224020
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al Khatib, H., Boubaker, Y., Morgan, E. [2021]. Breaking the seismic 4D ‘image’ paradigm of seismic monitoring.First Break, Volume 39, Issue 9, p. 85 – 91.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. UN, [2015]. Climate Change Conference (COP21), Paris Agreement https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/paris-agreement
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Furre, A-K., Eiken, O., Alnes, H., Vevatne, J., Kiær, A. [2017]. 20 Years of Monitoring CO 2 -injection at Sleipner.Energy Procedia. 114. 3916–3926.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. IEA [2021], Net Zero by 2050, IEA, Paris, https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050
  5. Li, J., Liner, C., Geng, P., Zeng, J. [2013]. Time-lapse seismic modeling for CO2 sequestration at the Dickman Oilfield, Kansas.Geophysics. 78. 147–B158.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Lumley, D. [2021]. Long-term time-lapse seismic monitoring of CO2 injection and storage projects for 50–100 years of regulatory compliance.SEG Global, Meeting abstracts: 17–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Morgan, E., Garden, M., Egreteau, A., Boubaker, Y., Gestin, K., Mari, J. [2020]. Focused and continuous ultra-light seismic monitoring: a gas storage example.82nd EAGE Conference.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Wierzchowska, M., Alnes, H., Oukili, J., Otterbein, C. [2021]. Broadband processing improves 4D repeatability and resolution at the Sleipner CO2 storage project, North Sea.82nd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, Volume 2021, p.1 – 5.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20224020
Loading
MMV Long Term Strategies to Calibrate and Support CO2 Storage Flow Models Using Focused Seismic
Conference Proceedings 2022, 1 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20224020
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20224020
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20224020
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error