oa Danube Loess Magnetostratigraphy: a Perspective from Ukraine

References

1. BakhmutovV., HlavatskyiD. (2022) On the reliability of a stratigraphic interpretation that overlooks geophysical techniques and results when determining the age of loess-soil deposits – comment on Łanczontet al. (2022) “A remarkable last glacial loess sedimentation at Roxolany in the Dniester Liman (Southern Ukraine)”. Quaternary Science Reviews, 107668.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BakhmutovV., HlavatskyiD., StepanchukV., Poliachenko, (2018) Rock magnetism and magnetostratigraphy of loess-palaeosol sections – Lower Paleolithic sites of Podolian upland (Medzhybizh, Holovchintsi).12th International Conference on Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment, Kyiv, Ukraine, 1–5.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BakhmutovV.G., KazanskiiA.Yu., MatasovaG.G., GlavatskiiD.V. (2017) Rock Magnetism and Magnetostratigraphy of the Loess-Sol Series of Ukraine (Roksolany, Boyanychi, and Korshev Sections).Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 53 (6), 65–86.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BokhorstM.P., BeetsC.J., MarkovićS.B., GerasimenkoN.P., MatviishinaZ.N., FrechenM. (2009) Pedo-Chemical Climate Proxies in Late Pleistocene Serbian–Ukrainian Loess Sequences.Quaternary International, 198, 113–123.
   [Google Scholar]
5. HlavatskyiD., BakhmutovV. (2021) Early-Middle Pleistocene Magnetostratigraphic and Rock Magnetic Records of the Dolynske Section (Lower Danube, Ukraine) and Their Application to the Correlation of Loess-Palaeosol Sequences in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe.Quaternary, 4 (4), 43.
   [Google Scholar]
6. HlavatskyiD.V., BakhmutovV.G. (2020) Magnetostratigraphy and magnetic susceptibility of the best developed Pleistocene loess-palaeosol sequences of Ukraine: implications for correlation and proposed chronostratigraphic models.Geological Quarterly, 64 (3), 723–753.
   [Google Scholar]
7. JordanovaD., PetersenN. (1999) Palaeoclimatic Record from a Loess-Soil Profile in Northeastern Bulgaria—II. Correlation with Global Climatic Events during the Pleistocene.Geophysical Journal International, 138, 533–540.
   [Google Scholar]
8. LisieckiL.E., RaymoM.E. (2005) A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records.Paleoceanography, 20, PA1003.
   [Google Scholar]
9. MakóL., MolnárD., RunaB., BozsóG., CsehP., NagyB., SümegiP. (2021) Selected Grain-Size and Geochemical Analyses of the Loess-Paleosol Sequence of Pécel (Northern Hungary): An Attempt to Determine Sediment Accumulation Conditions and the Source Area Location.Quaternary, 4, 17.
   [Google Scholar]
10. MarkovićS.B., StevensT., KuklaG.J., HambachU., FitzsimmonsK.E., GibbardP., BuggleB., ZechM., GuoZ., HaoQ., et al. (2015) Danube Loess Stratigraphy-Towards a Pan-European Loess Stratigraphic Model.Earth-Science Reviews, 148, 228–258.
    [Google Scholar]
11. MatoshkoA., MatoshkoA., de LeeuwA. (2019) The Plio-Pleistocene Demise of the East Carpathian Foreland Fluvial System and Arrival of the Paleo-Danube to The Black Sea.Geologica Carpathica, 70, 91–112.
    [Google Scholar]
12. NamierN, GaoX., HaoQ., MarkovićS.B., FuY., SongY., ZhangH, WuX., DengC, GavrilovM. B., GuoZ. (2021) Mineral magnetic properties of loess-paleosol couplets of northern Serbia over the last 1.0 Ma.Quaternary Research, 103, 35–48.
    [Google Scholar]
13. NeculaC., DimofteD., PanaiotuC. (2015) Rock Magnetism of a Loess-Palaeosol Sequence from the Western Black Sea Shore (Romania).Geophysical Journal International, 1733–1748.
    [Google Scholar]
14. RădanS.-C. (2012) Towards a Synopsis of Dating the Loess from the Romanian Plain and Dobrogea: Authors and Methods through Time.Geo-Eco-Marina2012, 18, 153–172.
    [Google Scholar]
15. SongY., GuoZ., MarkovićS., HambachU., DengC., ChangL., WuJ., HaoQ. (2018) Magnetic Stratigraphy of the Danube Loess: A Composite Titel-Stari Slankamen Loess Section over the Last One Million Years in Vojvodina, Serbia.Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 155, 68–80.
    [Google Scholar]
16. SümegiP., GulyásS., MolnárD., SümegiB.P., AlmondP.C., VandenbergheJ., ZhouL., Pál-MolnárE., TörőcsikT., HaoQ. et al. (2018) New Chronology of the Best Developed Loess/Paleosol Sequence of Hungary Capturing the Past 1.1 Ma: Implications for Correlation and Proposed Pan-Eurasian Stratigraphic Schemes.Quaternary Science Reviews, 191, 144–166.
    [Google Scholar]
17. SümegiP., GulyásS., MolnárD., SümegiB.P., TörőcsikT., AlmondP.C., SmalleyI., ZhouL., GalovicL., Pál-MolnárE., et al. (2019) Periodicities of Paleoclimate Variations in the First High-Resolution Non-Orbitally Tuned Grain Size Record of the Past 1 Ma from SW Hungary and Regional, Global Correlations.Aeolian Research, 40, 74–90.
    [Google Scholar]
18. TecsaV., GerasimenkoN., VeresD., HambachU., LehmkuhlF., SchulteP., Timar-GaborA. (2020) Revisiting the chronostratigraphy of Late Pleistocene loess-paleosol sequences in southwestern Ukraine: OSL dating of Kurortne section.Quaternary International, 542, 65–79.
    [Google Scholar]
19. WachaL., LaagC., GrizeljA., TsukamotoS., ZeedenC., IvaniševićD., RolfC., BanakA., FrechenM.High-Resolution Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction at Zmajevac (Croatia) over the Last Three Glacial/Interglacial Cycles.Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 576, 110504.
    [Google Scholar]