1887

Abstract

Summary

Polymer flooding is a widely applied EOR method to increase oil recovery from heavy oil reservoirs by improving the mobility and conformance control of the displacement process. Core and sandpack floodings have been mostly applied to evaluate the polymer flooding performance for a given reservoir; but the associated pore-scale dynamics with varying polymer MW and chemistry remains unclear in these experiments. Hence, a synergistic approach of coreflood testing along with visual experiments can provide the detailed insight of polymer flow behavior and performance. Microfluidic experiments through accurate representation of reservoir rock properties and several sequences of EOR fluid injections can bridge this gap. In this study, a microfluidic chip analogus to Bentheimer sandstone outcrop was designed for all the injection experiments. Single viscosity injection tests with 2 different polymer MW resulted in improved mobility control and faster and higher ultimate oil recovery with higher viscosity slug compared to lower viscosity. Sequential injection tests of low and high viscosity resulted in higher ultimate oil recovery with lower MW polymer due to improved sweep efficiency. Optical analysis suggested higher residual oil in porous media due to significant pore plugging and fingering behavior with the higher MW polymer compared to lower MW polymer.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202283018
2022-10-12
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ghosh, P., Ould Metidji, M., Dupuis, G., Wilton, R., Ravikiran, R., Bowers, A. and Seright, R. [2021] Pushing the Envelope of Polymer Injectivity in Low Permeability Sandstones. Paper presented at the 21st European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, EAGE IOR 2021, 19–22 April. (Online)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Qi, Z., Pierobon, S., Serediak, O., Le, J., Pettigrew, A., Abedini, A. [2022] Effects of thief zones on displacement efficiency: Microfluidic pore-scale and conformance control analysis. Fuel, 316, 123371, ISSN 0016-2361.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Thomas, A., Giddins, M.A. and Wilton, R. [2019] Why is it so Difficult to Predict Polymer Injectivity in Chemical Oil Recovery Processes. Paper presented at the 20th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, EAGE IOR 2019, Pau, France, 8–11 April.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Wever, D., Polgar, L., Stuart, M., Picchioni, F., Broekhuis, A. [2013] Polymer Molecular Architecture as a Tool for Controlling the Rheological Properties of Aqueous Polyacrylamide Solutions for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52, 47, 16993–17005.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202283018
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202283018
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error