1887

Abstract

Summary

Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) is one of the vital components in keeping the global temperature rise within the 1.5 degrees Celsius target. Depleted oil and gas reservoirs are suitable locations for sequestering CO2 owing to their rock and structural properties and easy access to required infrastructure. Abandoned wells in these reservoirs can be used to inject CO2 saving both time and cost. Understanding the well integrity is important for CO2 containment and leakage prevention. It requires significant effort from a subject matter expert(SME) to identify well integrity information in legacy well documents which often results in longer lead times of up to an year for a CO2 sequestration site to mature. Transformer based pre-trained state-of-the-art models are utilized to inject useful information extracted from the well documents, which can be used instantly by SMEs to classify a well as potential high or low risk to inject CO2. Fine-tuning these models on generic datasets and less than 50 domain-specific examples shows that we can infer relevant well information not provided by traditional rule-based approaches. Reducing the lead time in maturing a site for CO2 injection could contribute to faster CCS project delivery timelines and broader goal of achieving net-zero targets.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202332009
2023-03-20
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. [1]Friedlingstein, P. et.al., 2022. Global Carbon Budget 2021: Earth System Science Data14, 1917–2005https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/1917/2022/
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Smit, B. et.al., 2014. Introduction to Carbon Capture and Sequestration, Imperial College Press, London, 2014https://doi.org/10.1142/p911
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Czarnota, R. et.al., 2019. Carbon Dioxide Separation Technologies, Arc. Min. Sci.64, 487–498, DOI 10.24425/ams.2019.129364
    https://doi.org/10.24425/ams.2019.129364 [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]Yu, W. et.al., 2015. CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery in Bakken tight oil reservoirs, Fuels159, 354–363https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.092
    [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]Chen, J. et.al., 2021. Machine Learning in Automating Carbon Sequestration Site Assessment, Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning workshop at NeurIPS 2021
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Smith, R., 2007. An overview of the Tesseract OCR engine, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition 02629–633.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]Raffel, C. et.al., 2019. Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer, arXiv: 1910.10683
    [Google Scholar]
  8. [8]Dong, Z. et.al., 2022. Machine Learning in Automating Carbon Storage Site Assessment, Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference
    [Google Scholar]
  9. [9]Clark, C. et.al., 2019. Bool Q: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions, arXiv: 1905.10044
    [Google Scholar]
  10. [10]Devlin, J. et. al., 2018. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding, arXiv:1810.04805
    [Google Scholar]
  11. [11]Liu, Y. et.al., 2019. RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach, arXiv: 1907.11692
    [Google Scholar]
  12. [12]Segal, E. et.al., 2020. A Simple and Effective Model for Answering Multi-span Questions, Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 3074–3080
    [Google Scholar]
  13. [13]YoungT., et.al., 2017. Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing, arXiv:1708.02709
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202332009
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202332009
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error