An Integrated Workflow for Windfarm Site Characterization by Deep Learning

References

1. Abubakar, A., Brædstrup, M. J., Di, H., Diaz, A. T., Freeman, S., Hviid, S., Karkov, K. H., Kriplani, S., Manikani, S., Salun, G., and Zhao, T. [2021], Deep learning applications for wind farms site characterization and monitoring.91st SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 3009–3013
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chen, J., Vissinga, M., Shen, Y., Hu, S., Beal, E., and Newlin, J. [2021]. Machine learning-based digital integration of geotechnical and ultrahigh-frequency geophysical data for offshore site characterizations.Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 147, 04021160-1-14
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chen, X., Maniar, H., Abubakar, A. [2019]. Unsupervised well log reconstruction and outlier detection. U.S. Provisional Patent Application, 62/897,088 and International Patent Application, PCT/US2020/070494
   [Google Scholar]
4. Di, H., Abubakar, A. [2022a] Unsupervised learning for automated seismic-well tie.83rd EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition
   [Google Scholar]
5. Di, H., Abubakar, A. [2022b] Accelerating geotechnical soil characterization in offshore windfarm sites via semi-supervised learning.3rd EAGE Global Energy Transition Conference & Exhibition
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ettrich, N. [2018] Boulder-detection with machine learning. Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics ITWM Annual Report.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Guo, R., Maniar, H., Di, H., Moldoveanu, N., Abubakar, A., Li, M. [2020] Ground roll attenuation with an unsupervised deep learning approach.90th SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 3164–3168
   [Google Scholar]
8. Havelia, K., Manral, S., Tilley, S., Freeman, S., Kriplani, S. [2022] Integrating high-resolution seismic inversion with geotechnical data to assess subsurface soil profile in offshore wind farms.3rd EAGE Global Energy Transition Conference and Exhibition, 1–5.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Saad, O. M., Chen, Y. [2020] Deep denoising autoencoder for seismic random noise attenuation.Geophysics, 85, V367–V376.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Robertson, P. K. [1990] Soil classification using the cone penetration test.Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 27(1), 151–158
    [Google Scholar]
11. Sauvin, G., Vardy, M., Klinkvort, R. T., Vaneste, M., Forsberg, C. F., Kort, A. [2022] State-of-the-art ground model development for offshore renewables — TNW case study.3rd EAGE Global Energy Transition Conference and Exhibition, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Sankaranarayanan, B., Abubakar, A., Allen, D. F., and Granados, I. D. [2021] Automating the log interpretation workflow using machine learning.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, UAE.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Simoes, V., Maniar, H., Zhao, T., Abubakar, A., and Akkurt, R. [2022] A comparative study for machine-learning-based Methods for log prediction.SPWLA 63rd Annual Logging Symposium, Stavanger, Norway.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Thanoon, D., Vamaraju, J., Yang, H., Wei, K., Aussavy, A. V., and Chen, J. [2021] Deep Seismic2Well Tie: A Physics-guided CNN approach to a classic geophysical workflow.91st SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1541–1545.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Yuan, Y., Si, X., Zheng, Y. [2020] Ground-roll attenuation using generative adversarial networks.Geophysics, 85, WA255–WA267.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Zhao, T., Kriplani, S., Abubakar, A. [2021] Deep learning for horizon interpretation on 2D seismic data.82nd EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]