1887
Volume 48 Number 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Knowledge of pore pressure using seismic data will help in planning the drilling process to control potentially dangerous abnormal pressures. Various physical processes cause anomalous pressures on an underground fluid. Non‐equilibrium compaction is a significant process of overpressure generation. This occurs when the sedimentation rate is so rapid that the pore fluids do not have a chance to ‘escape’ from the pore space.

The model assumes a closed system and that the pore space is filled with water and hydrocarbon in a liquid state. Balancing mass and volume fractions yields the fluid pressure versus time of deposition and depth of burial. Thermal effects are taken into account. The pore pressure, together with the confining pressure, determines the effective pressure which, in turn, determines the bulk moduli of the rock matrix.

We assume a sandstone saturated with hydrocarbons and water, for which calibration of the model with experimental data is possible. The seismic velocities and attenuation factors are computed by using Biot’s theory of dynamic poroelasticity and the generalized linear solid. The example shows that the formation can be overpressured or underpressured depending on the properties of the saturating fluid. Wave velocities and quality factors decrease with decreasing differential pressure. The effect is important below approximately 20 MPa. The model is in good agreement with experimental data for Berea sandstone and provides a tool for predicting pore pressure from seismic attributes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2000.00197.x
2001-12-24
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BatzleM. & WangZ.GeophysicsSeismic properties of pore fluids57199213961408
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BerrymanJ.G., ThigpenL., ChinR.C.Y.Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaBulk elastic wave propagation in partially saturated porous solids841988360373
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BredehoeftJ.D. & HanshawB.B.Geological Society of America BulletinOn the maintenance of anomalous fluid pressures: I. Thick sedimentary sequences79196810971106
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CarcioneJ.M.Geophysical ProspectingVisco‐elastic effective rheologies for modelling wave propagation in porous media461998249270
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ChristensenN.I. & WangH.F.GeophysicsThe influence of pore pressure and confining pressure on dynamic elastic properties of Berea sandstone501985207213
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DasiosA., AstinT.R., McCannC.1998aCompressional‐wave attenuation from full waveform sonic data. 60th EAGE conference, Leipzig, Germany, Extended Abstracts, 10–44.
  7. DasiosA., AstinT.R., McCannC.1998bIncreasing confidence in seismic Q measurements: a comparison of estimates from sonic and surface seismic data. 68th SEG meeting, New Orleans, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1080–1083.
  8. DomenicoS.N.GeophysicsElastic properties of unconsolidated porous sand reservoirs42197713391368
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DuttaN.C.1983Shale compaction and abnormal pore pressures: a model of geopressures in the Gulf of Mexico Basin. 53rd SEG meeting, Las Vegas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, S20‐2.
  10. DuttaN.C. & LevinF.K.1990Geopressure. Geophysical Reprint Series No. 7. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  11. GangiA.F. & CarlsonR.L.TectonophysicsAn asperity‐deformation model for effective pressure2561996241251
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GistG.A.Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaFluid effects on velocity and attenuation in sandstones96199411581173
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HagueP.S.GeophysicsMeasurements of attenuation from vertical seismic profiles46198115481558
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HanD., NurA., MorganD.GeophysicsEffects of porosity and clay content on wave velocities in sandstones51198620932107
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HelleH.B., InderhaugO.H., KovalievV.P., MadatovA., MitrofanovG.M.1993Complex seismic decomposition – application to pore pressure prediction. 55th EAEG meeting, Stavanger, Norway, Expanded Abstracts, B005.
  16. MannD.M. & MackenzieA.S.Marine and Petroleum GeologyPrediction of pore fluid pressures in sedimentary basins719905565
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MavkoG. & MukerjiT.GeophysicsSeismic pore space compressibility and Gassmann’s relation60199517431749
    [Google Scholar]
  18. PeacockS., McCannC., SothcottJ., AstinT.R.GeophysicsExperimental measurements of seismic attenuation in microfractured sedimentary rock59199413421351
    [Google Scholar]
  19. PrasadM. & ManghnaniM.H.GeophysicsEffects of pore and differential pressure on compressional wave velocity and quality factor in Berea and Michigan sandstones62199711631176
    [Google Scholar]
  20. RubeyW.W. & HubbertM.K.Bulletin of the Geological Society of AmericaRole of fluid pressure mechanics of overthrust faulting, II. Overthrust belt in geosynclinal area of Western Wyoming in light of fluid pressure hypothesis701959167205
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SmithJ.E.Mathematical GeologyThe dynamics of shale compaction and evolution of pore‐fluid pressure31971239263
    [Google Scholar]
  22. WinklerK.W.Journal of Geophysical ResearchDispersion analysis of velocity and attenuation in Berea sandstone90198567936800
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ZimmermanR.W., SomertonW.H., KingM.S.Journal of Geophysical ResearchCompressibility of porous rocks91198612 76512 777
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2000.00197.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2000.00197.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error