Short note: Source geometry identification by simultaneous use of structural index and shape factor

References

1. AbdelrahmanE.M. & El‐ArabyH.M.1993. Shape and depth solutions from gravity data using correlation factors between successive least‐squares residuals. Geophysics58, 1785–1791.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AbdelrahmanE.M. & SharafeldinS.M.1995. A least‐squares minimization approach to shape determination from gravity data. Geophysics60, 589–590.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BarbosaV.C.F., SilvaJ.B.C. & MedeirosW.E.1999. Stability analysis and improvement of structural index estimation in Euler deconvolution. Geophysics64, 48–60.
   [Google Scholar]
4. DavisW.E., JacksonW.H. & RichterD.H.1957. Gravity prospecting for chromites in Camaguey province, Cuba. Geophysics22, 848–869.
   [Google Scholar]
5. GrantF.S. & WestG.F.1965.Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics. McGraw‐Hill Book Co.
   [Google Scholar]
6. HoodP.1965. Gradient measurements in aeromagnetic surveying. Geophysics30, 891–902.
   [Google Scholar]
7. KeatingP.B.1998. Weighted Euler deconvolution of gravity data. Geophysics63, 1545–1603.
   [Google Scholar]
8. KlingeleE.E., MarsonI. & KahleH.G.1991. Automatic interpretation of gravity gradiometric data in two dimensions: vertical gradient. Geophysical Prospecting39, 407–434.
   [Google Scholar]
9. MarsonI. & KlingeleE.E.1993. Advantages of using the vertical gradient of gravity for 3‐D interpretation. Geophysics58, 1588–1595.
   [Google Scholar]
10. NandiB.K., ShawR.K. & AgarwalB.N.P.1997. Identification of the shape of simple causative sources from gravity data. Geophysical Prospecting45, 513–520.
    [Google Scholar]
11. ReddiA.G.B., MurthyB.S.R. & KesavananiM.1995.A Compendium of Four Decades of Geophysical Activity in Geological Survey of India. GSI Special Publication No. 36. Geological Survey of India.
    [Google Scholar]
12. ReidA.B., AllsopJ.M., GranserH., MillettA.J. & SomertonI.W.1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics55, 80–91.
    [Google Scholar]
13. RoyL., AgarwalB.N.P. & ShawR.K.1999. Estimation of shape factor and depth from gravity anomalies due to some simple sources. Geophysical Prospecting47, 41–58.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1999.00116.x
    [Google Scholar]
14. RoyL., AgarwalB.N.P. & ShawR.K.2000. A new concept in Euler deconvolution of isolated gravity anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting48, 559–575.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.2000.00203.x
    [Google Scholar]
15. SlackH.A., LynchV.M. & LaganL.1967. The geomagnetic gradiometer. Geophysics32, 872–877.
    [Google Scholar]
16. StavrevP.Y.1997. Euler deconvolution using differential similarity transforms of gravity and magnetic anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting45, 207–246.
    [Google Scholar]
17. ThompsonD.T.1982. EULDPH: a new technique for making computer assisted depth estimates for magnetic data. Geophysics47, 31–37.
    [Google Scholar]