1887
Volume 50, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A genetic annealing (GAN) algorithm is used to derive an empirical model which predicts compressional‐wave velocity values for overpressured siliciclastic rocks. The algorithm involves non‐linear random searching and mutation techniques and its annealing component imposes a very strict control over the rate of convergence of the search. This technique provides an alternative to the standard calculations involving the effective stress coefficient (). The pore pressure is introduced into the model as an explicit variable and as part of an overpressure coefficient, (/) − the ratio of pore to confining pressure. Empirical model‐derived data and known laboratory data are compared and their differences are shown to be within statistically acceptable error limits. The empirical equation fits all under‐ and overpressured data simultaneously, irrespective of pore fluid pressure level, with the same parameters. It is used to predict seismic velocities very accurately for extreme levels of overpressure, starting from normally pressured experimental data. The model highlights the effect of pore pressure on the compressional‐wave velocity of fully saturated samples with different clay contents. It can be used when the experimental data available are sparse and particularly when a prediction of material behaviour is necessary at specific pore fluid pressure and depth conditions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2002.00315.x
2002-11-23
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Eberhart‐PhillipsD., HanD.‐H. and ZobackM.D.1989. Empirical relationships among seismic velocity, effective pressure, porosity and clay content in sandstone. Geophysics54, 82–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. FreundD.1992. Ultrasonic compressional and shear velocities in dry clastic rocks as a function of porosity, clay content and confining pressure. Geophysical Journal International108, 125–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GallagherK. and SambridgeM.1994. Genetic algorithms: a powerful tool for large‐scale non‐linear optimisation problems. Computers and Geosciences20, 1229–1236.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. HimmelblauD.M.1970. Process Analysis by Statistical Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. HornbyB.1994. The elastic properties of shale . PhD thesis, Cambridge University.
  6. HornbyB.1996. Experimental determination of the anisotropic elastic properties of shales. In: SEG Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Seismic Anisotropy (eds E.Fjaer , R.M.Holt and J.S.Rathore ), pp. 238–297.
  7. HorneS. and MacBethC.1994. Inversion for seismic anisotropy using genetic algorithms. Geophysical Prospecting42, 953–974.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.1996.Rock Physics Handbook.Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. McCannC. and SothcottJ.1992. Laboratory measurement of seismic properties of sedimentary rocks. In: Geological Society Special Publication (eds A.Hurst et al. ) No. 65, pp. 285–297.
  10. McLaughlinM.P.1989. Simulated annealing. Dr. Dobb's Journal, Software Tools for Professional Programmers14(9), 26–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. PrasadM. and ManghnaniM.H.1997. Effects of pore and differential pressure on compressional‐wave velocity and quality factor in Berea and Michigan sandstones. Geophysics62, 1163–1176.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. PriceK.V.1994. Genetic annealing. Dr. Dobb's Journal, Software Tools for Professional Programmers14(9), 127–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. SayersC.M.1994. The elastic anisotropy of shales. Journal of Geophysical Research99(B1), 767–774.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ToddT. and SimmonsG.1972. Effect of pore pressure on the velocity of compressional waves in low‐porosity rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research77, 3731–3743.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2002.00315.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2002.00315.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error