1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 62, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 62, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

In hydraulic fracturing experiments, perforation shots excite body and tube waves that sample, and thus can be used to characterize, the surrounding medium. While these waves are routinely employed in borehole operations, their resolving power is limited by the experiment geometry, the signal‐to‐noise ratio, and their frequency content. It is therefore useful to look for additional, complementary signals that could increase this resolving power. Tube‐to‐body‐wave conversions (scattering of tube to compressional or shear waves at borehole discontinuities) are one such signal. These waves are not frequently considered in hydraulic fracture settings, yet they possess geometrical and spectral attributes that greatly complement the resolution afforded by body and tube waves alone. Here, we analyze data from the Jonah gas field (Wyoming, USA) to demonstrate that tube‐to‐shear‐wave conversions can be clearly observed in the context of hydraulic fracturing experiments. These waves are identified primarily on the vertical and radial components of geophones installed in monitoring wells surrounding a treatment well. They exhibit a significantly lower frequency content (10–100 Hz) than the primary compressional waves (100–1000 Hz). Tapping into such lower frequencies could help to better constrain velocity in the formation, thus allowing better estimates of fracture density, porosity and permeability. Moreover, the signals of tube‐to‐shear‐wave conversion observed in this particular study provide independent estimates of the shear wave velocity in the formation and of the tube wave velocity in the treatment well.

Copyright © 2014 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2014 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12095
2014-02-21
2024-04-28

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12095
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK. and RichardsP.G.2002. Quantitative Seismology. University Science Books, 2nd edition.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. AlbrightJ.N. and JohnsonP.A.1990. Cross‐borehole observation of mode conversion from borehole Stoneley waves to channel waves at a coal layer. Geophysical Prospecting38(6), 607–620.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. AldridgeD.F.1992. Comments on “Conversion points and traveltimes of converted waves in parallel dipping layers” by Gisa Tessmer and Alfred Behle. Geophysical Prospecting40(1), 101–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. AronstamP.S.2004. Use of minor borehole obstructions as seismic sources. US Patent6, 747, 914.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BeydounW.B., ChengC.H. and ToksözM.N.1985. Detection of open fractures with vertical seismic profiling. Journal of Geophysical Research90(B6), 4557–4566.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. ChengC.H. and ToksözM.N.1981. Elastic wave propagation in a fluid‐filled borehole and synthetic acoustic logs. Geophysics46(7), 1042–1053.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. GreenhalghS., ZhouB. and CaoS.2003. A crosswell seismic experiment for nickel sulphide exploration. Journal of Applied Geophysics53( 2–3), 77–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. GreenhalghS.A., MasonI.M. and SinadinovskiC.2000. In‐mine seismic delineation of mineralization and rock structure. Geophysics65(6), 1908–1919.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. HardageB.A.2000. Vertical Seismic Profiling: Principles, vol. 14, Handbook of Geophysical Exploration Seismic Exploration. Pergamon Press, 3rd edition.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. HornbyB.E. and MurphyIIIW.F.1987. Vp/Vs in unconsolidated oil sands: Shear from Stoneley. Geophysics52(4), 502–513.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. KwanA., DudleyJ. and LantzE.2002. Who really discovered Snell's law? Physics World15(4), 64.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. LeeM.W., BalchA.H. and ParrottK.R.1984. Radiation from a downhole air gun source. Geophysics49(1), 27–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. MaxwellS.C., ShemetaJ. and HouseN.2006. Integrated anisotropic velocity modeling using perforation shots, passive seismic and vsp data. 68th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, A046.
  14. NorrisM. and AronstamP.2003. Use of autonomous moveable obstructions as seismic sources. US Patent6,662,899.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. RobinsonJ.W. and ShanleyK.W. (ed.). 2005. Jonah Field: Case Study of a Tight‐Gas Fluvial Reservoir, Vol. 52. AAPG Studies in Geology, American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. SeherT., RondenayS. and DjikpesseH.2011. Hydraulic Fracture Monitoring: A Jonah Field Case Study. Earth Resources Laboratory Consortium Meeting.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. SirgueL. and PrattR.G.2004. Efficient waveform inversion and imaging: A strategy for selecting temporal frequencies. Geophysics69(1), 231–248.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. StewartR.R., HuddlestonP.D. and KanT.K.1984. Seismic versus sonic velocities: A vertical seismic profiling study. Geophysics49(8), 1153–1168.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. TaylorG.G.1989. The point of p‐s mode‐converted reflection: An exact determination. Geophysics54(8), 1060–1063.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. TessmerG. and BehleA.1988. Common reflection point data‐stacking technique for converted waves. Geophysical Prospecting36(7), 671–688.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. TessmerG., KrajewskiP., FertigJ. and BehleA.1990. Processing of PS‐reflection data applying a common conversion‐point stacking technique. Geophysical Prospecting38(3), 267–268.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. VirieuxJ. and OpertoS.2009. An overview of full‐waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics74(6), WCC1–WCC26.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. WhiteJ.E. and SengbushR.L.1963. Shear waves from explosive sources. Geophysics28(6), 1001–1019.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. WillsP.B., DeMartiniD.C., VinegarH.J., ShlyapoberskyJ., DeegW.F., WoerpelJ.C., FixJ.E., SorrelisG.G. and AdairR.G.1992. Active and passive imaging of hydraulic fractures. Leading Edge11(7), 15–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. WinklerK.W., LiuH.‐L. and JohnsonD.L.1989. Permeability and borehole Stoneley waves: Comparison between experiment and theory. Geophysics54(1), 66–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. WuR.S. and ToksozM.N.1987. Diffraction tomography and multisource holography applied to seismic imaging. Geophysics52(1), 11–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. XuK. and GreenhalghS.2010. Ore‐body imaging by crosswell seismic waveform inversion: A case study from Kambalda, Western Australia. Journal of Applied Geophysics70(1), 38–45.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12095
Loading
Tube wave to shear wave conversion at borehole plugs
Geophysical Prospecting 62, 540 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12095
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12095
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12095
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Borehole geophysics; Monitoring; Seismics; Wave

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error