1887
Volume 63, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Gas‐Oil Gravity Drainage is to be enhanced by steam injection in a highly fractured, low permeability carbonate field in Oman. Following a successful pilot, field‐wide steam injection is being implemented, first of this type in the world. A dedicated monitoring program has been designed to track changes in the reservoir. Various observations are to be acquired, including, surface deformation, temperature measurements, microseismic, well logs, pressure and saturation measurements to monitor the reservoir. Because significant changes in the reservoir density are expected, time‐lapse gravimetry is also being considered. In this paper we investigate the feasibility of gravimetric monitoring of the thermally enhanced gravity drainage process at the carbonate field in Oman. For this purpose, forward gravity modelling is performed. Based on field groundwater measurements, the estimates of the hydrological signal are considered and it is investigated under what conditions the groundwater influences can be minimized. Using regularized inversion of synthetic gravity data, we analyse the achievable accuracy of heat‐front position estimates. In case of large groundwater variations at the field, the gravity observations can be significantly affected and, consequently, the accuracy of heat‐front monitoring can be deteriorated. We show that, by applying gravity corrections based on local observations of groundwater, the hydrological influences can to a large extent be reduced and the accuracy of estimates can be improved. We conclude that gravimetric monitoring of the heat‐front evolution has a great potential.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12150
2015-03-20
2020-02-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AhmadZamriA.F., MusgroveF.W., BridleI.M., AngelichM.T. and Van den BoschR.2009. Successful reservoir monitoring with 4D microgravity at Ras Laffan, state of Qatar. International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar.
  2. AlnesH., EikenO., NoonerS., SasagawaG., StenvoldT. and ZumbergeM.2011. Results from Sleipner gravity monitoring: Updated density and temperature distribution of the CO2 plume. Energy Procedia. 4(0), 5504–5511.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AlnesH., EikenO. and StenvoldT.2008. Monitoring gas production and CO2 injection at the Sleipner field using time‐lapse gravimetry. Geophysics73(6), WA155–WA161.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BoerrigterP. and van DorpJ.2009. Advances in understanding thermally assisted GOGD. 15th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Paris, France.
  5. BradyJ., HareJ., FergusonJ., SeibertJ., KloppingF., ChenT. and NiebauerT.2008. Results of the world's first 4D microgravity surveillance of a waterflood‐Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas.
  6. BychkovA., VerlaanM., BoerrigterP., van HeelT. and van DorpJ.2008, Steam injection into fractured carbonates ‐ the physical recovery mechanisms analyzed and upscaled. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
  7. CreutzfeldtB., GüntnerA., KlügelT. and WziontekH.2008. Simulating the influence of water storage changes on the superconducting gravimeter of the geodetic observatory Wettzell, Germany. Geophysics73(6), WA95–WA104.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. EikenO., StenvoldT., ZumbergeM., AlnesH. and SasagawaG.2008. Gravimetric monitoring of gas production from the Troll field. Geophysics73(6), WA149–WA154.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. FergusonJ.F., KloppingF.J., ChenT., SeibertJ.E., HareJ.L. and BradyJ.L.2008. The 4D microgravity method for waterflood surveillance: Part 3 — 4D absolute microgravity surveys at Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. Geophysics73(6), WA163–WA171.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GirardA.1989. A fast Monte‐Carlo cross‐validation' procedure for large least squares problems with noisy data. Numerische Mathematik56, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GlegolaM., DitmarP., BierkensM.F.P., ArtsR. and VossepoelF.C.2009. Estimation of the time‐lapse gravity errors due to water table and soil moisture variations. SEG Expanded Abstracts28, 976, Houston, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GolubG.H., HeathM. and WahbaG.1979. Generalized cross‐validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics21(2), pp. 215–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HagoortJ.1980. Oil recovery by gravity drainage. SPE Journal20(3), 139–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HansenP.C. and O'LearyD.P.1993. The use of the l‐curve in the regularization of discrete ill‐posed problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 14(6), 1487–1503.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HareJ.L., FergusonJ.F. and BradyJ.L.2008. The 4D microgravity method for waterflood surveillance: Part IV — modeling and interpretation of early epoch 4D gravity surveys at Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. Geophysics73(6), WA173–WA180.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KochK.‐R. and KuscheJ.2002. Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components. Journal of Geodesy pp. 259–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LastB.J. and KubikK.1983. Compact gravity inversion. Geophysics48(6), 713–721.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. NagyD., PappG. and BenedekJ.2000. The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. Journal of Geodesy74, 552–560.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. NoonerS., EikenO., HermanrudC., SasagawaG., StenvoldT. and ZumbergeM.2007. Constrains on the in situ density of CO2 within the utsira formation from time‐lapse seafloor gravity measurements. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control pp. 198–214.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. PenneyR., LawatiS.B.A., HinaiR., van RavesteijnO., RawnsleyK., PutraP., GeneauM., IkwumonuA., HabsiM. and HarrasyH.2007. First full field steam injection in a fractured carbonate at Qarn Alam, oman, SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Kingdom of Bahrain.
  21. PortniaguineO. and ZhdanovM.S.1999. Focusing geophysical inversion images. Geophysics64(3), 874–887.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. RemyN., BoucherA. and WuJ.2009. Applied geostatistics with SGeMS : a user's guide. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SiddiqueM.2011. Application of time lapse gravity in history matching a gas/condensate field. EAGE/SPE Joint Workshop, Istanbul, Turkey.
  24. TikhonovA. and ArseninV.1977. Solutions of ill‐posed problems. Scripta series in mathematics, Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. TorgeW.1989. Gravimetry. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ZhdanovM.S.2002. Geophysical inverse theory and regularization problems. Elsevier, Amsterdam ‘New York’ Tokyo.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ZumbergeM., vard AlnesH., EikenO., SasagawaG. and StenvoldT.2008. Precision of seafloor gravity and pressure measurements for reservoir monitoring. Geophysics73(6), WA133–WA141.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12150
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12150
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Gravity , Monitoring , Noise , Reservoir geophysics and Time‐lapse
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error