1887
Volume 63, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Topography and severe variations of near‐surface layers lead to travel‐time perturbations for the events in seismic exploration. Usually, these perturbations could be estimated and eliminated by refraction technology. The virtual refraction method is a relatively new technique for retrieval of refraction information from seismic records contaminated by noise. Based on the virtual refraction, this paper proposes super‐virtual refraction interferometry by cross‐correlation to retrieve refraction wavefields by summing the cross‐correlation of raw refraction wavefields and virtual refraction wavefields over all receivers located outside the retrieved source and receiver pair. This method can enhance refraction signal gradually as the source–receiver offset decreases. For further enhancement of refracted waves, a scheme of hybrid virtual refraction wavefields is applied by stacking of correlation‐type and convolution‐type super‐virtual refractions. Our new method does not need any information about the near‐surface velocity model, which can solve the problem of directly unmeasured virtual refraction energy from the virtual source at the surface, and extend the acquisition aperture to its maximum extent in raw seismic records. It can also reduce random noise influence in raw seismic records effectively and improve refracted waves’ signal‐to‐noise ratio by a factor proportional to the square root of the number of receivers positioned at stationary‐phase points, based on the improvement of virtual refraction's signal‐to‐noise ratio. Using results from synthetic and field data, we show that our new method is effective to retrieve refraction information from raw seismic records and improve the accuracy of first‐arrival picks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12202
2014-12-07
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlshuailA., AldawoodA. and HanafyS.2012. Application of super‐virtual seismic refraction interferometry to enhance first arrivals: A case study from Saudi Arabia. The Leading Edge, 34–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BakulinA. and CalvertR.2006. The virtual source method: Theory and case study. Geophysics71, SI139–SI150.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BakulinA., MateevaA., CalvertR., JorgensenP. and LopezJ.2007. Virtual shear source makes shear waves with air guns. Geophysics72, A7–A11.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BharadwajP., SchusterG.T. and MallinsonI.2011. Super‐virtual Refraction Interferometry: Theory. 81st SEG annual international meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3809–3813.
  5. ClaerboutJ.F.1968. Synthesis of a layered medium from its acoustic transmission response. Geophysics33, 264–269.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DongS., ShengJ. and SchusterJ.T.2006. Theory and practice of refraction interferometry. 76th SEG annual international meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3021–3025.
  7. DraganovD., WapenaarK. and ThorbeckeJ.2006. Seismic interferometry: Reconstructing the earth's reflection response. Geophysics71, SI61–SI70.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DraganovD., HellerK. and GhoseR.2012. Monitoring CO2 storage using ghost reflections retrieved from seismic interferometry: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control11S, S35–S46.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HanafyS., AlhaganO. and Al‐TawashF.2011. Super‐virtual Refraction Interferometry: Field Data Example over a Colluvial Wedge. 81st SEG annual international meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3814–3818.
  10. KingS. and CurtisA.2012. Suppressing nonphysical reflections in Green's function estimates using source‐receiver interferometry. Geophysics77, Q15–Q25.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KorneevV. and BakulinA.2006. On the fundamentals of the virtual source method. Geophysics71, A13–A17.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MallinsonI., BharadwajP. and SchusterG.T.2011. Enhanced refractor imaging by supervirtual interferometry. The Leading Edge, 546–550.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MikesellT.D., van WijkK., CalvertA. and HaneyM.2009. The virtual refraction: Useful spurious energy in seismic interferometry. Geophysics74, A13–A17.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MikesellT.D. and van WijkK.2011. Seismic refraction interferometry with a semblance analysis on the crosscorrelation gather. Geophysics76, SA77–SA82.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MikesellT.D., van WijkK., RuigrokE., LambA. and BlumT.2012. A modified delay‐time method for statics estimation with the virtual refraction. Geophysics77, A29–A33.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SchusterG.T.2001. Theory of Daylight/Interferometric Imaging: Tutorial. 63rd Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Expanded Abstracts, A‐32.
  17. SchusterG.T., YuJ., ShengJ. and RickettJ.2004. Interferometric/daylight seismic imaging. Geophysical Journal International157, 838–852.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SchusterG.T.2009. Seismic Interferometry. Cambridge University Press, UK.
  19. SniederR., WapenaarK. and LarnerK.2006. Spurious multiples in seismic interferometry of primaries. Geophysics71, SI111–SI124.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ThorbeckeJ.W. and DraganovD.2011. Finite‐difference modeling experiments for seismic interferometry. Geophysics76, H1–H18.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. WapenaarK. and FokkemaJ.2006. Green's function representation for seismic interferometry. Geophysics71, SI33–SI46.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12202
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12202
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acoustic; Seismic; Theory; Wave

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error