1887
Volume 67 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The effect of surface phenomena occurring at the interfaces between immiscible fluids and a solid on the seismic attributes of partially saturated rocks has not yet been fully studied. Meanwhile, over the past two decades considerable progress has been made in the physics of wetting to understand effects such as contact line friction, contact line pinning, contact angle hysteresis, and equilibrium contact angle. In this paper, we developed a new rock physics model considering the aforementioned effects on seismic properties of the rock with a partially saturated plane‐strain crack. We demonstrated that for small wave‐induced stress perturbations, the contact line of the interface meniscus will remain pinned, while the meniscus will bulge and change its shape through the change of the contact angles. When the stress perturbation is larger than a critical value, the contact line will move with advancing or receding contact angle depending on the direction of contact line motion. A critical stress perturbation predicted by our model can be in the range of ∼102−104 Pa, that is typical for linear seismic waves. Our model predicts strong seismic attenuation in the case when the contact line is moving. When the contact line is pinned, the attenuation is negligibly small. Seismic attenuation is associated with the hysteresis of loading and unloading bulk moduli, predicted by our model. The hysteresis is large when the contact line is moving and negligibly small when the contact line is pinned. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the bulk modulus of the rock with a partially saturated crack depends also on the surface tension and on the contact angle hysteresis. These parameters are typically neglected during calculation of the effecting fluid moduli by applying different averaging techniques. We demonstrate that contact line friction may be a dominant seismic attenuation mechanism in the low frequency limit (<∼10 Hz) when capillary forces dominate over viscous forces during wave‐induced two‐phase fluid flow.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12653
2018-07-04
2020-02-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AdamL. and BatzleM.2008. Elastic properties of carbonates from laboratory measurements at seismic and ultrasonic frequencies. The Leading Edge27, 1026–1032.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AdamL., BatzleM. and BrevikI.2006. Gassmann's fluid substitution and shear modulus variability in carbonates at laboratory seismic and ultrasonic frequencies. Geophysics71, F173–F183.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AmalokwuK., BestA.I. and ChapmanM.2016. Effects of aligned fractures on the response of velocity and attenuation ratios to water saturation variation: a laboratory study using synthetic sandstones. Geophysical Prospecting64, 942–957.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. AmalokwuK., PapageorgiouG., ChapmanM. and BestA.I.2017. Modelling ultrasonic laboratory measurements of the saturation dependence of elastic modulus: new insights and implications for wave propagation mechanisms. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control59, 148–159.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AmalokwuK.I.2016. Saturation effects on frequency‐dependent seismic anisotropy in fractured porous rocks. Southampton, UK: Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. AuriaultJ.L., BoutinC., RoyerP. and SchmittD.2002. Acoustics of a porous medium saturated by a bubbly fluid undergoing phase change. Transport in Porous Media46, 43–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BachrachR.2006. Joint estimation of porosity and saturation using stochastic rock‐physics modeling. Geophysics71, O53‐O63.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BarenblattG.I., EntovV.M. and RyzhikV.M.1989. Theory of fluid flows through natural rocks. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BauerA.K.M.2016. Seismic to ultrasonic dispersion in shale: the role of saturation. ROSE meeting, 25–28 May.
  10. BhaktaT., AvsethP. and LandrøM.2016. Sensitivity analysis of effective fluid and rock bulk modulus due to changes in pore pressure, temperature and saturation. Journal of Applied Geophysics135, 77–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. BormashenkoE.2016. Physics of solid–liquid interfaces: from the Young equation to the superhydrophobicity. Low Temperature Physics42, 622–635.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. BormashenkoE.Y.2013. Wetting of Real Surfaces, Vol. 19. Walter de Gruyter.
  13. BornW.T.1941. The attenuation constant of earth materials. Geophysics6, 132–148.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. BrieA., PampuriF., MarsalaA.F. and MeazzaO.1995. Shear sonic interpretation in gas‐bearing sands. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, 22–25 October. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
  15. BroadheadM.K.2012. Effect of contact line motion on QP and QS for partially saturated rocks. 82nd SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1–6. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  16. BrunnerW. and SpetzlerH.A.2001. Observations of time‐dependent meniscus behavior with implications for seismic attenuation in three‐phase systems. Geophysical Research Letters28, 1867–1870.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. CadoretT., MavkoG. and ZinsznerB.1998. Fluid distribution effect on sonic attenuation in partially saturated limestones. Geophysics63, 154–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. CarlsonA., BellaniG. and AmbergG.2012. Universality in dynamic wetting dominated by contact‐line friction. Physical Review E85.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ChelidzeT.L., SpetzlerH.A. and SobolevG.A.1996. Absorption of strain waves in porous media at seismic frequencies. Pure and Applied Geophysics147, 25–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ChibowskiE.2008. Surface free energy of sulfur—revisited I. Yellow and orange samples solidified against glass surface. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science319, 505–513.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. De GennesP.G., Brochard‐WyartF. and QuéréD.2013. Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves. Springer Science & Business Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. DomenicoS.N.1974. Effect of water saturation on seismic reflectivity of sand reservoirs encased in shale. Geophysics39, 759–769.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. EddiA., WinkelsK.G. and SnoeijerJ.H.2013. Short time dynamics of viscous drop spreading. Physics of Fluids25, 013102.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. EthingtonE.F.1990. Interfacial contact angle measurements of water, mercury, and 20 organic liquids on quartz, calcite, biotite, and Ca‐montmorillonite substrates, Open‐File Report, No. 90–409. US Geological Survey.
  25. GassmannF.1951. Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. GregoryA.R.1976. Fluid saturation effects on dynamic elastic properties of sedimentary rocks. Geophysics41, 895–921.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. HofmannR.2006. Frequency dependent elastic and anelastic properties of clastic rocks. Doctoral dissertation, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.
  28. HudsonJ.A.1988. Seismic wave propagation through material containing partially saturated cracks. Geophysical Journal International92, 33–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. KnightR., Pyrak‐NolteL.J., SlaterL., AtekwanaE., EndresA., GellerJ.et al. 2010. Geophysics at the interface: response of geophysical properties to solid‐fluid, fluid‐fluid, and solid‐solid interfaces. Reviews of Geophysics48.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kraemer, E.O. 1931. A Treatise on Physical Chemistry. Edited by H.S.Taylor, New York, D. Van Nostrand Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. LiD., WeiJ., DiB., DingP. and ShuaiD.2017. The effect of fluid saturation on the dynamic shear modulus of tight sandstones. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering14.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. LibbyB. and MonsonP.A.2004. Adsorption/desorption hysteresis in inkbottle pores: a density functional theory and Monte Carlo simulation study. Langmuir20, 4289–4294.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. LoW.C., SpositoG. and MajerE.2005. Wave propagation through elastic porous media containing two immiscible fluids. Water Resources Research41.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. MavkoG. and JizbaD.1991. Estimating grain‐scale fluid effects on velocity dispersion in rocks. Geophysics56, 1940–1949.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.2009. The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media. Cambridge university press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. MavkoG.M. and NurA.1979. Wave attenuation in partially saturated rocks. Geophysics44, 161–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. McBainJ.W.1935. An explanation of hysteresis in the hydration and dehydration of gels. Journal of the American Chemical Society57, 699–700.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. MikhaltsevitchV., LebedevM. and GurevichB.2016. Laboratory measurements of the effect of fluid saturation on elastic properties of carbonates at seismic frequencies. Geophysical Prospecting64, 799–809.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. MiksisM.J.1988. Effects of contact line movement on the dissipation of waves in partially saturated rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth93, 6624–6634.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. MoerigR., WaiteW.F., BoydO.S., GettingI.C. and SpetzlerH.A.1996. Seismic attenuation in artificial glass cracks: physical and physicochemical effects of fluids. Geophysical Research Letters23, 2053–2056.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. MüllerT.M. and GurevichB.2004. One‐dimensional random patchy saturation model for velocity and attenuation in porous rocks. Geophysics69, 1166–1172.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. MüllerT.M., GurevichB. and LebedevM.2010. Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion resulting from wave‐induced flow in porous rocks—a review. Geophysics75, 75A147–75A164.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. MurphyW.F.1984. Acoustic measures of partial gas saturation in tight sandstones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth89, 11549–11559.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. MurphyW.F., III, WinklerK.W. and KleinbergR.L.1986. Acoustic relaxation in sedimentary rocks: dependence on grain contacts and fluid saturation. Geophysics51, 757–766.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. PapageorgiouG., AmalokwuK. and ChapmanM.2016. Theoretical derivation of a Brie‐like fluid mixing law. Geophysical Prospecting64, 1048–1053.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. PapageorgiouG. and ChapmanM.2017. Wave‐propagation in rocks saturated by two immiscible fluids. Geophysical Journal International209, 1761–1767.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. PrideS.R., BerrymanJ.G. and HarrisJ.M.2004. Seismic attenuation due to wave‐induced flow. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth109.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. PrideS.R. and FlekkøyE.G.1999. Two‐phase flow through porous media in the fixed‐contact‐line regime. Physical Review E60, 4285.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. QiQ., MüllerT.M., GurevichB., LopesS., LebedevM. and CaspariE.2014. Quantifying the effect of capillarity on attenuation and dispersion in patchy‐saturated rocks. Geophysics79, WB35‐WB50.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. RenW. and EW.2007. Boundary conditions for the moving contact line problem. Physics of Fluids19, 022101.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. RozhkoA.Y.2016. Two‐phase fluid‐flow modeling in a dilatant crack‐like pathway. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering146, 1158–1172.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. RozhkoA.Y., WennbergO.P. and JonoudS.2017. Modelling of normal net stress effect on two‐phase relative permeability and capillary pressure of rough‐walled fracture. In IOR 2017—19th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Stavanger, Norway, Extended abstract.
  53. Ruiz‐CabelloF.M., Rodríguez‐ValverdeM.A. and Cabrerizo‐VílchezM.A.2014. Equilibrium contact angle or the most‐stable contact angle?Advances in colloid and interface science206, 320–327.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. SchüttH., KöhlerJ., BoydO. and SpetzlerH.2000. Seismic attenuation in partially saturated dime‐shaped cracks. Pure and Applied Geophysics157, 435–448.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. SpencerJ.W., Jr. and ShineJ.2016. Seismic wave attenuation and modulus dispersion in sandstones. Geophysics81, D211–D231.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. StarovV.M. and VelardeM.G.2009. Surface forces and wetting phenomena. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter21.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. SubramaniyanS.2016. Experimental study of seismic attenuation in reservoir rocks. Doctoral dissertation, University in Zürich, Switzerland. ETH Zurich.
  58. SzewczykD., BauerA. and HoltR.M.2017. Stress and saturation dependent properties of shales ‐ Laboratory measurements at seismic and ultrasonic frequencies. 4th International Workshop on Rock Physics, Trondheim, Norway, 29 May–2 June.
  59. TadmorR.2004. Line energy and the relation between advancing, receding, and young contact angles. Langmuir20, 7659–7664.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. TisatoN., ChapmanS., ZhaoQ., GrasselliG. and QuintalB.2015. Seismic wave attenuation in rocks saturated with bubbly liquids: experiments and numerical modeling. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 3254–3258. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  61. TisatoN., GrasselliG., QuintalB. and PodladchikovY.2014. Seismic wave attenuation in fluid‐saturated rock as result of gas dissolution. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 1985–1990. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  62. WaiteW., MoerigR. and SpetzlerH.1997. Seismic attenuation in a partially saturated, artificial crack due to restricted contact line motion. Geophysical Research Letters24, 3309–3312.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. WalshJ.B.1965. The effect of cracks on the compressibility of rock. Journal of Geophysical Research70, 381–389.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. WangZ., SchmittD.R. and WangR.2015. Does wettability influence seismic wave propagation in liquid‐saturated porous rocks?Geophysical Journal International203, 2182–2188.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. WollnerU. and DvorkinJ. 2018. Effective bulk modulus of the pore fluid at patchy saturation. Geophysical Prospecting66, 1372–1383.
  66. YaminskyV.V.2000. Molecular mechanisms of hydrophobic transitions. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 14, 187–233.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. YarushinaV.M. and PodladchikovY.Y.2010. Plastic yielding as a frequency and amplitude independent mechanism of seismic wave attenuation. Geophysics75, N51–N63.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12653
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12653
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Attenuation , Mathematical formulation , Numerical study , Rock physics and Theory
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error