Volume 67, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478



The paper presents 3D diffraction imaging based on the spectral decomposition of a different combination of selective or partial images. These images are obtained by the pre‐stack asymmetric migration procedure, which is weighted data summation. Spectral decomposition is done in the Fourier domain with respect to spatial dip and azimuth angles. Numerical examples with the application of different workflows for the synthetic and real data examples demonstrate detailed reliable reconstruction of the fractured zones and reliable reconstruction of fracture orientation on synthetic and real 3D data examples.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. BansalR. and ImhofM.2005. Diffraction enhancement in prestack seismic data. Geophysics70, 73–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DevaneyA.J.1984. Geophysical diffraction tomography. IEEE Trans. Geoscience Remote Sensing22, 3–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. FomelS., LandaE. and TanerT.2007. Poststack velocity analysis by separation and imaging of seismic diffractions. Geophysics72, 89–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. KhaidukovV., LandaE. and MoserT.J.2004. Diffraction imaging by focusing‐defocusing: an outlook on seismic super resolution. Geophysics69, 1478–1490.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KlokovA., BainaR. and LandaE.2010. Separation and imaging of seismic diffractions in dip angle domain. 72th EAGE annual meeting, Barcelona, Spain, Expanded Abstracts, G040.
  6. KlokovA., BainaR. and LandaE.2011. Point and edge diffractions in three dimensions. 73rd EAGE annual meeting, Vienna, Austria, Expanded Abstracts, B023.
  7. KlokovA. and FomelS.2012. Separation and imaging of seismic diffractions using migrated dip‐angle gathers. Geophysics77, S131–S143.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. KorenZ. and RavveI.2010. Full‐azimuth subsurface angle domain wave‐field decomposition and imaging Part 1: Directional and reflection image gathers. Geophysics76, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LandaE., FomelS. and ReshefM.2008. Separation, imaging, and velocity analysis of seismic diffractions using migrated dip‐angle gathers. 72th SEG annual meeting. Expanded Abstracts, P.2176–1100.
  10. MoserT.J. and HowardC.B.2008. Diffraction imaging in depth. Geophysical Prospecting56, 627–642.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. PopovM.M.2002. Ray theory and Gaussian beam for geophysicists. Editoria da Universidade Federal da Bahia, SALVADOR.
  12. ProtasovM.I., ReshetovaG.V. and TcheverdaV.A.2016a. Fracture detection by Gaussian beam imaging of seismic data and image spectrum analysis. Geophysical Prospecting64, 68–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ProtasovM., SilvestrovI., TcheverdaV., IsakovN. and PravduhinA.2016b. 3D anisotopic Gaussian beam true‐amplitude depth imaging of seismic data. 78th EAGE. Expanded Abstracts, WeSRS305.
  14. ProtasovM.I., TcheverdaV.A., PravduhinA.P. and IsakovN.G.2017. 3D anisotropic imaging of 3D seismic data on the basis of Gaussian beams. Seismic Technologies1, 35–38. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ReshefM. and LandaE.2009. Poststack velocity analysis in the dip‐angle domain using diffractions. Geophysical Prospecting57, 811–821.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. WoodwardM., NicholsD., ZdravevaO., WhitfieldP. and JohnsT.2008. A decade of tomography. Geophysics73, VE5–VE11.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D , Diffractions and Seismic imaging
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error