1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 69, Issue 6
  5. Article
Volume 69, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Seismic waves passing through partially saturated porous rocks produce pressure gradients in the fluid phase, and, hence, the resulting fluid flow is accompanied by various length scales. The major mechanism responsible for seismic attenuation and dispersion is arguably known as wave‐induced fluid flow between inhomogeneities of microscopic, mesoscopic and macroscopic scales. Previous studies have revealed that differentiating the influence of heterogeneities at various scales on wave attenuation within seismic exploration and sonic frequencies, nevertheless, is very difficult. This is because wave attenuation mechanisms due to different heterogeneities are practically impossible to be unrelated. Therefore, it is important for a more quantitative interpretation of the relative contribution of inter‐dependent energy loss mechanisms through improved understanding of the combined influences associated to the microscopic squirt flow and mesoscopic fluid flow. We introduce a scaled poroelastic model to evaluate frequency‐dependent attenuation and velocity dispersion characteristics by considering the combined presence of microscopic and mesoscopic heterogeneities. To do so, the capillarity effects are incorporated into the poroelastic model with random distributions of the sizes of mesoscopic‐scale heterogeneities. A range of pertinent scenarios are calculated, and the acoustic properties indicate wave attenuation decreases whereas the phase velocity increases corresponding to additional capillary forces. Meanwhile, numerical results of the proposed model were compared with experimental measurements of a tight sandstone to examine its validity. Results of numerical simulations suggest that seismic reflections produce more complicated signatures in the presence of an interbedded structure of a reservoir exhibiting velocity dispersion. Therefore, the proposed procedure can help in assessing the sensitivities of frequency‐dependent seismic signatures to reservoir fluid mobility and patch heterogeneities.

© 2021 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2021 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13101
2021-06-14
2024-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13101
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ba, J., Xu, W.H., Fu, L.Y., Carcione, J.M. and Zhang, L. (2017) Rock anelasticity due to patchy saturation and fabric heterogeneity: a double‐porosity model of wave propagation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 122, 1949–1976.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Batzle, M.L., Han, D.H. and Hofmann, R. (2006) Fluid mobility and frequency‐dependent seismic velocity – Direct measurement. Geophysics, 71, N1‐N9.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Biot, M. (1956) Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid saturated porous solid. I. Low frequency range. Journal of the Acoustical Society America, 28, 168–178.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bouzidi, Y. and Schmitt, D.R. (2006) A large ultrasonic bounded acoustic pulse transducer for acoustic transmission goniometry: modeling and calibration. Journal of the Acoustical Society America, 119, 54–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Carcione, J.M. (2001) AVO effects of a hydrocarbon source‐rock layer. Geophysics, 66, 419–427.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Carcione, J.M. and Picotti, S. (2006) P‐wave seismic attenuation by slow‐wave diffusion: effects of inhomogeneous rock properties. Geophysics, 71, O1–O8.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chapman, M. (2003) Frequency dependent anisotropy due to meso‐scale fractures in the presence of equant porosity. Geophysical Prospecting, 51, 369–379.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chapman, M., Liu, E. and Li, X.Y. (2006) The influence of fluid‐sensitive dispersion and attenuation on AVO analysis. Geophysical Journal International, 167, 89–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Dupuy, B. and Stovas, A. (2014) Influence of frequency and saturation on AVO attributes for patchy saturated rocks. Geophysics, 79, B19–B36.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Dvorkin, J. and Uden, R. (2004) Interpreter's corner – seismic wave attenuation in a methane hydrate reservoir. The Leading Edge, 23, 730–723.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Goertz, D. and Knight, R. (1998) Elastic wave velocities during evaporative drying. Geophysics, 63, 171–183.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo, J.X., Rubino, J.G., Barbosa, N.D., Glubokovskikh, S. and Gurevich, B. (2018) Seismic dispersion and attenuation in saturated porous rocks with aligned fractures of finite thickness: theory and numerical simulations – Part 1: P‐wave perpendicular to the fracture plane. Geophysics, 83, WA49–WA62.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Guo, Z.Q., Liu, C., Li, X.Y. and Lan, H.T. (2015) An improved method for the modeling of frequency‐dependent amplitude‐versus‐offset variations. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12, 63–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gurevich, B. and Lopatnikow, S.L. (1995) Velocity and attenuation of elastic waves in finely layered porous rocks. Geophysical Journal International, 121, 933–947.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gurevich, B., Makarynska, D., de Paula, O.B. and Pervukhina, M. (2010) A simple model for squirt‐flow dispersion and attenuation in fluid‐saturated granular rocks. Geophysics, 75, N109–N120.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. He, Y.X., Wang, S.X., Tang, G.Y., Wu, X.Y. and Xi, B. (2021) Analysis of wave dispersion and attenuation effects on seismic low‐frequency reflections of a poroelastic layer. Exploration Geophysics, 52, 77–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. He, Y.X., Wang, S.X., Wu, X.Y. and Xi, B. (2020) Influence of frequency‐dependent anisotropy on seismic amplitude‐versus‐offset signatures for fractured poroelastic rocks. Geophysical Prospecting, 68, 2141–2163.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. He, Y.X., Wu, X.Y., Fu, K., Zhou, D. and Wang, S.X. (2018) Modeling the effect of microscopic and mesoscopic heterogeneities on frequencies on frequencies‐dependent attenuation and seismic signatures. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 18, 1174–1178.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. He, Y.X., Wu, X.Y., Wang, S.X. and Zhao, J.G. (2019) Reflection dispersion signature due to wave‐induced pressure diffusion in heterogeneous poroelastic media. Exploration Geophysics, 50, 541–553.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, H., Wang, D.X., Gao, J.H., Zhang, M.B., Wang, Y.R., Zhao, L.X. and Yang, Z.F. (2020a) Role of saturation on elastic dispersion and attenuation of tight rocks: an experimental study. Journal of Geophysical Research, 125, 2019JB018513.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, H., Zhao, L.X., Han, D.H., Gao, J.H., Yuan, H.M. and Wang, Y.R. (2020b). Experimental study on frequency‐dependent elastic properties of weakly consolidated marine sandstone: effects of partial saturation. Geophysical Prospecting, 68(9), 2808–2824.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, Y. (2004) Seismic ‘low frequency shadows’ for gas sand reflection. 74th Annual International Meeting: SEG, 1563–1566.
  23. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. and Dvorkin, J. (2009) The Rock Physics Handbook. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Müller, T. and Gurevich, B. (2005) Wave‐induced fluid flow in random porous media: attenuation and dispersion of elastic waves. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 2732–2741.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Müller, T. and Rothert, E. (2006) Seismic attenuation due to wave‐induced flow: why Q in random structures scales differently. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L16305.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Müller, T., Gurevich, B. and Lebedev, M. (2010) Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion resulting from wave‐induced flow in porous rocks – a review. Geophysics, 75, A147–A164.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Qi, Q.M., Müller, T.M., Gurevich, B., Lopes, S., Lebedev, M. and Caspari, E. (2014a) Quantifying the effect of capillarity on attenuation dispersion in patchy‐saturated rocks. Geophysics, 79, WB35–WB50.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Qi, Q.M., Müller, T.M. and Rubino, J.G. (2014b) Seismic attenuation: effects of interfacial impedance on wave‐induced pressure diffusion. Geophysical Journal International, 199, 1677–1681.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Quintal, B., Schmalholz, S.M. and Podladchikov, Y.Y. (2009) Low‐frequency reflection from a thin layer with high attenuation caused by interlayer flow. Geophysics, 74, N15‐N23.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Quintal, B., Schmalholz, S.M. and Podladchikpv, Y.Y. (2011a) Impact of fluid saturation on the reflection coefficient of a poroelastic layer. Geophysics, 76, N1–N12.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Quintal, B., Steeb, S., Frehner, M. and Schmalholz, S.M. (2011b) Quasi‐static finite element modeling of seismic attenuation and dispersion due to wave‐induced fluid flow in poroelastic media. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, B1201.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Ren, H.T., Goloshubin, G. and Hilterman, F.J. (2009) Poroelastic analysis of amplitude‐versus‐frequency variation. Geophysics, 74, N41–N48.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Ren, S.B., Han, T.C. and Fu, L.Y. (2020) Theoretical and experimental study of P‐wave attenuation in partially saturated sandstones under different pressures. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 63, 2722–2736 (in Chinese).
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Rubino, J.G. and Holliger, K. (2013) Research note: seismic attenuation due to wave‐induced fluid flow at microscopic and mesoscopic scales. Geophysics Prospecting, 61, 882–889.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. SenguptaM. and MavkoG. (2003). Impact of flow‐simulation parameters on saturation scales and seismic velocity. Geophysics, 68, 1267–1280.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Sun, C.Tang, G.Y.Dong, C.H. and Wang, S.X. (2017) Fluid saturation effect on the characteristic frequency and attenuation of tight sandstone. EAGE Annual Meeting Expanded Abstracts 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Toms, J., Müller, T.M. and Gurevich, B. (2007) Seismic attenuation in porous rocks with random patchy saturation. Geophysical Prospecting, 55, 671–678.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Tserkovnyak, Y. and Johnson, D.L. (2003) Capillary forces in the acoustics of patchy‐saturated porous media. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 2596–2606.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. White, J.E., Mikhaylova, N. and Lyakhovitskiy, F. (1975) Low‐frequency seismic waves in fluid‐saturated layered media. Physics of the Solid Earth, 11, 645–659.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Yin, H.J., Zhao, J.G., Tang, G.Y., Zhao, L.M., Ma, X.Y. and Wang, S.X. (2017) Pressure and fluid effect on frequency‐dependent elastic moduli in fully saturated tight sandstone. Journal of Geophysical Research, 122, JB014244.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhao, L.X., Han, D.H., Yao, Q.L., Zhou, R. and Yan, F.Y. (2015) Seismic reflection dispersion due to wave‐induced fluid flow in heterogeneous reservoir rocks. Geophysics, 80, D221– D235.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhao, L.X., Yuan, H., Yang, J., Han, D.H., Geng, J.H., Zhou, R., et al. (2017) Mobility effect on poroelastic seismic signatures in partially saturated rocks with applications in time‐lapse monitoring of a heavy oil reservoir. Journal of Geophysical Research, 122, 8872–8891.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13101
Loading
Analysis of the frequency dependence characteristics of wave attenuation and velocity dispersion using a poroelastic model with mesoscopic and microscopic heterogeneities
Geophysical Prospecting 69, 1260 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13101
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13101
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.13101
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acoustic; Attenuation; Elastics; Rock physics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error