A computational review of the line integral analytical formulation of the polyhedral gravity signal

References

1. Barnett, C.T. (1976) Theoretical modeling of the magnetic and gravitational fields of an arbitrary shaped three‐dimensional body. Geophysics, 41, 1353–1364.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Benedek, J., Papp, G. and Kalmár, J. (2018) Generalization techniques to reduce the number of volume elements for terrain effect calculations in fully analytical gravitational modelling. Journal of Geodesy, 92(4), 361–381.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bucha, B., Janák, J., Papčo, J. and Bezdek, A. (2016) High‐resolution regional gravity field modelling in a mountainous area from terrestrial gravity data. Geophysical Journal International, 207(2), 949–966.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Capponi, M., Mansi, A.H. and Sampietro, D. (2018) Improving the computation of the gravitational terrain effect close to ground stations in the GTE software. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 62(2), 206–222.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chanut, T.G.G., Aljbaae, S., Prado, A.F.B.A. and Carruba, V. (2017) Dynamics in the vicinity of (101955) Bennu: solar radiation pressure effects in equatorial orbits. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 470(3), 2687–2701.
   [Google Scholar]
6. D'Urso, M.G. (2013) On the evaluation of the gravity effects of polyhedral bodies and a consistent treatment of related singularities. Journal of Geodesy, 87(3), 239–252.
   [Google Scholar]
7. D'Urso, M.G. (2014) Gravity effects of polyhedral bodies with linearly varying density. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 120(4), 349–372.
   [Google Scholar]
8. D'Urso, M.G. and Trotta, S. (2017) Gravity anomaly of polyhedral bodies having a polynomial density contrast. Surveys in Geophysics, 38(4), 781–832.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fukushima, T. (2017) Precise and fast computation of the gravitational field of a general finite body and its application to the gravitational study of asteroid Eros. Astronomical Journal, 154(4), 145
   [Google Scholar]
10. Götze, H.J. and Lahmeyer, B. (1988) Application of three‐dimensional interactive modeling in gravity and magnetics. Geophysics, 53, 1096–1108.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hansen, R.O. (1999) An analytical expression for the gravity field of a polyhedral body with linearly varying density. Geophysics, 64, 75–77.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Holstein, H. (2003) Gravimagnetic anomaly formulas for polyhedra of spatially linear media. Geophysics, 68, 157–167.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Holstein, H. and Ketteridge, B. (1996) Gravimetric analysis of uniform polyhedra. Geophysics, 61, 357–364.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Jiang, Y., Baoyin, H. and Yang, M. (2018) Dynamical model of binary asteroid systems using binary octahedrons. Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 39(5), 54
    [Google Scholar]
15. Okabe, M. (1979) Analytical expressions for gravity anomalies due to homogeneous polyhedral bodies and translations into magnetic anomalies. Geophysics, 44, 730–741.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Petrovic, S. (1996) Determination of the potential of homogeneous polyhedral bodies using line integrals. Journal of Geodesy, 71(1), 44–52.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Pohánka, V. (1988) Optimum expression for computation of the gravity field of a homogeneous polyhedral body. Geophysical Prospecting, 36, 733–751.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ren, Z., Chen, C., Zhong, Y., Chen, H., Kalscheuer, T., Maurer, H., et al. (2020) Recursive analytical formulae of gravitational fields and gradient tensors for polyhedral bodies with polynomial density contrasts of arbitrary non‐negative integer orders. Surveys in Geophysics, 41(4), 695–722.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ren, Z., Zhong, Y., Chen, C., Tang, J., Kalscheuer, T., Maurer, H. and Li, Y. (2018) Gravity gradient tensor of arbitrary 3D polyhedral bodies with up to third‐order polynomial horizontal and vertical mass contrasts. Surveys in Geophysics, 39(5), 901–935.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Saraswati, A.T., Cattin, R., Mazzotti, S. and Cadio, C. (2019) New analytical solution and associated software for computing full‐tensor gravitational field due to irregularly shaped bodies. Journal of Geodesy, 93(12), 2481–2497.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Schmidt, S., Plonka, C., Götze, H.J. and Lahmeyer, B. (2011) Hybrid modelling of gravity, gravity gradients and magnetic fields. Geophysical Prospecting, 59(6), 1046–1051.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Singh, B. and Guptasarma, D. (2001) New method for fast computation of gravity and magnetic anomalies from arbitrary polyhedral. Geophysics, 66, 521–526.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Tsoulis, D. (2003) Terrain modeling in forward gravimetric problems: a case study on local terrain effects. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 54(1–2), 145–160.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Tsoulis, D. (2012) Analytical computation of the full gravity tensor of a homogeneous arbitrarily shaped polyhedral source using line integrals. Geophysics, 77(2), F1–F11.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Tsoulis, D. and Petrovic, S. (2001) On the singularities of the gravity field of a homogeneous polyhedral body. Geophysics, 66(2), 535–539.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Vitale, A. and Fedi, M. (2020) Inversion of potential fields with an inhomogeneous depth weighting function. SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting (2019), 1749–1753.
27. Werner, R.A. (1994) The gravitational potential of a homogeneous polyhedron. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 59(3), 253–278.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Werner, R.A. and Scheeres, D.J. (1997) Exterior gravitation of a polyhedron derived and compared with harmonic and mascon gravitation representations of asteroid 4769 Castalia. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 65(3), 313–344.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Zhang, Y. and Chen, C. (2018) Forward calculation of gravity and its gradient using polyhedral representation of density interfaces: an application of spherical and ellipsoidal topographic gravity effect. Journal of Geodesy, 92(2), 205–218.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Zuber, M.T., Smith, D.E., Cheng, A.F., Garvin, J.B., Aharonson, O., Cole, T.D., et al. (2000) The shape of 433 Eros from the NEAR‐Shoemaker Laser Rangefinder. Science, 289, 2097–2101.
    [Google Scholar]