1887
Volume 9 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

Since 1955, the continuous velocity measurements in bore holes, made with one, later with more receivers, have become indispensable for the geophysicist, and can be useful to the geologist and the production engineer. From the beginning we have found that the amplitudes of the signals received vary in the course of a single operation. The variations have for a long time been considered as a disturbing phenomenon. It was tried to suppress them by changing the instrument gain.

With increasing precision of the velocity measurements we have sometimes observed anomalies that were hard to explain, discrepancies between the continuous velocity logs and the conventional well velocity survey, as well as between continuous velocity measurements made with different spacings. These phenomena could be observed in cased as well as in uncased holes. The first attempts to explain these phenomena by considering the velocities only, did not lead to an acceptable theory. A further study of these anomalies of the continuous velocity log has shown that in reality they were caused by strong variations of the amplitude which affected the velocity measurements. This result has led us to study the amplitude variations in open as well as in cased holes.

Up to now, the characteristics of the apparatus used in France and in the Sahara have permitted amplitude measurements with a single receiver only. In addition to the “cement bond log” in cased holes, it seems that in open holes correlations can be observed between the measured amplitude and a) the lithology; b) the fluid contained in the pores; c) the continuity of the matrix or, conversely, the permeability. However, it is now certain that numerous factors affect the amplitudes of the signals simultaneously.

In order to study the attenuation of ultrasonic waves in the different formations traversed by a deep well, we have studied the deformations of the signal in the course of its path in the mud and in the formation, restricting ourselves to the waves. The factors to be taken in consideration are: a) the geometric energy dispersion, inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source; b) attenuation by absorption and scattering in the mud and in the formation; c) the transmission coefficients at the transition from mud to formation and conversely, as well as at the transition between two formations having different velocities; d) phenomena of signal composition that are due to the fact that the receivers and the transmitters have a non‐infinitesimal length; these last mentioned phenomena have considerable influenc eon the amplitudes of the received signals.

Finally, the practical method for obtaining an attenuation log in an open hole requires the measurement of the ratio of the amplitudes of the first arrivals at the two receivers. Some examples show the importance of amplitude measurements made with two receivers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1961.tb01674.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Grosmangin, M., Kokesh, F. P., Majani, P., 1961, A Sonic Method for analysing the Quality of Cementation of Borehole Casings. Journal of Petroleum Technology.
  2. Karus, E. V., Zuckernick, V. B., 1958, An Ultrasonic Apparatus for studying the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Rocks intersected by a Drill‐Hole. English Edition of Bulletin (Izvestiya), Academy of Sciences, U.S.S.R., Geophysics Series.
  3. Kokesh, F. P., Blizard, R. B., 1959, Geometrical Factors in Sonic Logging, Geophysics, XXIV.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ladefroux, J., 1960, La Diagraphie de Vitesse. Etude Bibliographique, Institut Français du Pétrole.
  5. Lavergne, M., 1961, Etude sur Modèle Ultrasonique du Problème des Couches Minces et Sismique Réfraction. Geophysical Prospecting.
  6. Lebreton, F., Arnaud, J., 1960, Cours de Diagraphies Acoustiques. Institut Français du Pétrole.
  7. Manchee, E. B., 1959, Direct Integration of Continuous Velocity Logs, Geophysics, XXIV.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Morlet, J., 1960. Limitations d'Emploi des Dispositifs d'Emission et de Réception non‐Ponctuels. Report: Compagnie d'Exploration Pétrolière, 20.6.60, Chambourcy (S. et O.).
  9. Savit, C. H., Brustad, J. T., Sider, J., 1958, The Moveout Filter, Geophysics, XXIII.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Schwaetzer, T., 1960, Well Surveys and the Calibration of Velocity Logs. Geophysical ProspectingVIII.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Stripling, 1958, Velocity Log Characteristics. A.I.M.E.—Petroleum Transactions.
  12. Thurber, C. H., Gay, B. J., 1960, Sata Log. Preprint “to be presented at the 35th Annual Fall Meeting”, A.I.M.E. Denver, Colorado.
  13. Thurber, C. H., Latson, B. F., The Sata Cement Log. Publication of P.G.A.C.
  14. Wyllie, 1957, The Fundamentals of Electric Log Interpretation.Academic Press, New York .
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1961.tb01674.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error