1887
Volume 18 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The principle of optical pumping allows the design of magnetometers with high sensitivity. When mapping the field of the total magnetic force, it is no longer possible to make full use of the accuracy of the instruments because the accuracy of the reduction of the diurnal variation is limited. By simultaneously recording with two instruments in different altitudes, the vertical gradient can be measured which doe's not depend on the time variation of the magnetic field. Therefore, the gradiometer seems to be a more adequate tool for oil exploration than the magnetometer.

It is investigated in this article whether the results of this gradiometer or the measurements of the total magnetic field by the high sensitive magnetometer are more useful in oil exploration. The article comes to the conclusion that for most problems of oil exploration the total magnetic field is a more valuable unit than the vertical gradient measured directly by the gradiometer. The total magnetic field allows a better investigation of the tectonics than the vertical gradient. The apparent advantages of the gradiometer claimed by its supporters are mainly based on inconsistent mathematical concepts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1970.tb02099.x
2006-04-27
2020-07-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baranov, V., 1954, Calcul du gradient vertical du champ de gravité ou du champ magnétique mesuréà la surface du sol. Geophysical Prospecting2, 171–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baranov, V., 1957, A new method for Interpretation of Aeromagnetic Maps: Pseudo‐Gravimetric Anomalies. Geophysics22, 359–383.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bosum, W., 1966, An Automatic Method for the Interpretation of Magnetic Anomalies by Least Squares. Paper presented at the Twenty‐Eighth Meeting of EAEG in Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Elkins, T. A., 1951, The Second Derivative Method of Gravity Interpretation. Geophysics16, 29–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Giret, R. I., 1965, Some Results of Aeromagnetic Surveying with Digital Cesium‐Vapor Magnetometer. Geophysics30, 883–890.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hood, P., 1965, Gradient Measurements in Aeromagnetic Surveying. Geophysics30, 891–902.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jensen, H., 1965, Instrument Details and Applications of a New Airborne Magnetometer. Geophysics30, 875–882.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kellog, W. C, with replies by Steenland, N. C, Jensen, H. and Giret, R. I., 1966, On High Sensitive Aeromagnetic Surveying, Geophysics31, 824–828.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Linsser, H., 1967, Investigation of Tectonics by Gravity Detailing. Geophysical Prospecting15, 480–515.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Linsser, H., 1968, Transformation of Magnetometric Data into Tectonic Maps by Digital Template Analysis. Geophysical Prospecting16, 179–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lynch, V. W., Slack, H. A. and Langan, L., 1966, The Rubidium Vapor Gradiometer and its Application in the Delaware Basin. Paper presented at the Thirteenth Annual Exploration Meeting of the Permian Basin Geophysical Society, Midland , Texas .
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Rover, G., 1967, Two Year's Survey with Cesium Vapour Magnetometer. Geophysical Prospecting15, 174–193.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Slack, H. H., Lynch, V. M. and Langan, L., 1967, The Geomagnetic Gradiometer. Geophysics32, 877–892.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Steenland, N. C, 1965, Oil Fields and Aeromagnetic Anomalies. Geophysics30, 706–739.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Thyssen‐Bornemisza, S., 1967, A New Parameter for Aeromagnetic Surveying. Geophysical Prospecting15, 204–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Vaquier, V., Steenland, N. C, Henderson, R. G. and Zietz, I., 1951, Interpretation of Aeromagnetic Maps. Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem.47, 151 p.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1970.tb02099.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error