1887
Volume 19 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

Boundary‐value problems in steady‐state current flow were solved numerically for one and two layers over a half‐space. Solutions were obtained for layers of various resistivities where one of the current sources was placed below the surface and the second kept at some finite distance from the drill hole. When a fixed surface dipole receiving pair was used, it was found that as the buried source approached a conductive region, quite good determinations of the depth to the conductor could be made, hence reducing the possibility of extended drilling in “dry” holes resulting from poor surface data and/or interpretation. Numerous models were generated to find the optimum positioning of the two current electrodes for different field situations of this type. It was also found that by placing a current source in the conductive region, better resolution of the lateral extent of a possible ore zone could be obtained, due both to the more rapid convergence of the apparent resistivity to the resistivity of the conductor, and the fact that a smaller separation in the receiving dipole could be used. Numerous analog models were constructed to verify the digital results. Surface and down‐hole resistivity field data are compared to show the strength of this technique in delineating structure.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1971.tb00906.x
2006-04-27
2020-04-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alfano, L., 1962, Geoelectrical prospecting with underground electrodes: Geophysical Prospecting10, 290–303.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fokin, A. F., 1961, Pole tochechnogo istochnika toka i zaryazhennogo prorodnika na ploskoy dnevnoy poverkhnosti v sluchaye neodnorodney sredy: Vses. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Metod. i Tekhn. Razvedki Trudy, Sbornik3, 172–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kononenko, I. I., 1965, Pole pogruzhennogo isochnika toka v sloistoy srede: Akad. Nauk SSSR Ural. Filial Inst. Geofiziki Trudy no. 3, 143–148.
  4. Korunova, A. F., 1962, Pole tochecknogo isochnika toka, pomeshchennogo na glubine v prisutstvii ideal' no provody ashchey sfery: Akad. Nauk SSSR Ural. Filial Inst. Geofiziki Trudy no. 2, 235–242.
  5. Meinardus, H. A., 1967, The kernel function in direct current resistivity sounding: Colorado School of Mines, Ph.D. thesis.
  6. Merkel, R. H., 1969, Potential field development from steady‐state current flow with buried sources in an inhomogeneous half‐space: The Pennsylvania State University, Ph.D. thesis.
  7. Merkel, R. H., and Alexander, S. S., 1971, Resistivity analysis for models of a sphere in a half‐space with buried current sources: accompanying paper.
  8. Mooney, H. M., Orellana, E., Pickett, H. and Tornheim, L., 1966, A resistivity computation method for layered earth models: Geophysics31, 192–203.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Roman, I., 1963, The kernel function in the surface potential for a horizontally stratified earth: Geophysics28, 232–249.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1971.tb00906.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error