1887
Volume 21 Number 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

For the two and three layer cases geo‐electrical sounding graphs can be rapidly and accurately evaluated by comparing them with an adequate set of standard model graphs. The variety of model graphs required is reasonably limited and the use of a computer is unnecessary for this type of interpretation.

For more than three layers a compilation of model graphs is not possible, because the variety of curves required in practice increases immensely. To evaluate a measured graph under these conditions, a model graph is calculated by computer for an approximately calculated resistivity profile which is determined, for example, by means of the auxiliary point methods. This model graph is then compared with the measured curve, and from the deviation between the curves a new resistivity profile is derived, the model graph of which is calculated for another comparison procedure, etc. This type of interpretation, although exact, is very inconvenient and time‐consuming, because there is no simple method by which an improved resistivity profile can be derived from the deviations between a model graph and a measured graph.

The aim of this paper is, on the one hand, to give a simple interpretation method, suitable for use during field work, for multi‐layer geo‐electrical sounding graphs, and, on the other hand, to indicate an automatic evaluation procedure based on these principles, suitable for use by digital computer.

This interpretation system is based on the resolution of the kernel function of Stefanescu's integral into partial fractions. The system consists of a calculation method for an arbitrary multi‐layer case and a highly accurate approximation method for determining those partial fractions which are important for interpretation. The partial fractions are found by fitting three‐layer graphs to a measured curve. Using the roots and coefficients of these partial fractions and simple equations derived from the kernel function of Stefanescu's integral, the thicknesses and resistivities of layers may be directly calculated for successively increasing depths.

The system also provides a simple method for the approximative construction of model graphs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1973.tb00039.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Deppermann, K., 1961, On the calculation of electrical resistivity curves. Early papers and History of the EAEG, The Hague , 147–148.
  2. Flathe, H., 1955, A practical method of calculating geoelectrical model graphs for horizontally stratified media. Geophys. Prosp.3, 268–294.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hummel, J. N., 1929, Der scheinbare spezifische Widerstand, Z.f. Geophysik5, 89–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hummel, J. N., 1929, Der scheinbare spezifische Widerstand bei vier planparallelen Schichten, Z.f. Geophysik5, 228–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Magnus, W. and Oberhettinger, F., 1948, Formeln und Sätze für die speziellen Funktionen der mathematischen Physik. 230 S. Berlin.
  6. Muskat, M., 1933, Potential distribution about an electrode on the surface of the earth, Physics4, 129–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Slichter, L. B., 1933, The interpretation of the resistivity prospecting method for horizontal structures, Physics4, 307–322.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Stefanescu, S., Schlumberger, C. M. and, 1930, Sur la distribution électrique potentielle autour d'une prise de terre punctuelle dans un terrain à couches horizontales, homogénes, et isotropes. Journ. de physique et le radium7, 132–140.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1973.tb00039.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error