1887
Volume 21 Number 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

Numerical solutions of the wave equation for a particular type of non‐linear “constant ” medium were carried out. These solutions were obtained after the transformation of the space derivatives in finite differences; power series of the time are used to express the solutions.

The medium is characterized by a not single valued stress‐strain relation; the stresses are greater when the absolute values of strain are increasing (passive work), and are less when they are decreasing (active work). A loss of energy follows which is constant for every cycle and independent of frequency. This model represents the simplest type of medium in agreement with the laboratory data on rock samples. For a similar medium the stress’values do not depend only on the instantaneous value of the strain, but also on the previous strain values, i.e. the history of the medium. All these characteristics are not compatible with linearity and require particular types of computing procedures similar to the one shown in this paper.

The results of calculations here shown refer both to the propagation of an isolated wave and to the generation of a wave in a spherical hole by change of pressure. They refer particularly to the shape, the amplitude and the width of the isolated wave along the propagation path. The most important results for this type of medium are the following:

) for a plane single isolated wave, the displacement amplitude wave does not change along the propagated distance. The width increases linearly as function of the distance;

) the corresponding particle velocity decreases in amplitude;

) for single isolated spherical waves the displacement amplitude decreases with propagated distance only due to the geometric factor, i.e. inversely proportional to the propagated distance; its width increases in the same way as for plane waves.

The comparison between these theoretical results with the field and seismological data show a sufficiently good agreement as far as the value interval of wave width and frequencies is concerned. Less satisfactory is the comparison regarding a linear dependence of the wave width on the distance. This fact happens probably because in the field often long trains of waves and not isolated waves occur. In effect, for trains of waves the behaviour is different than that of an isolated wave; particularly, for the former the frequency variations along the travelled path is less and the displacement variations greater.

However, it seems likely that a further similar theoretical research for trains of waves propagating in this type of non‐linear medium might be carried out to complete the present research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1973.tb00042.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alfano, L., 1967, A Method of Tackling some Seismic Problems and its Applications, Geophisical Prospecting15, 334–382.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, D. L., 1967, The Anelasticity of the Mantle, Geophysical Journal14, 135–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anstey, N. A., 1941, A Note on the Seismic Pulse Recorded from a Mine Exploration, Geophys. Prosp.6, 433–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Born, W. T., 1941, The Attenuation Constant of Earth Materials, Geophysics6, 132–148.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruckshaw, J. M. and MahantaP. C., 1954, The Variation of the Elastic Constants of Rocks with Frequency, Petroleum, vol. 42; 14–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Caputo, M., 1967, Linear Models of Dissipation whose “Q” is almost Frequency Independent — II, Geophysical Journal18, 529–539.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gutenberg, B., 1958, Attenuation of Seismic Waves in the Earth's Mantle, Bull, of the Seismic Soc of America48, 269–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Knopoff, L. and MacDonaldG., 1958, Attenuation of Small Amplitude Stress Waves in Solids, Rev. of Modern Physics30, 1178–1192.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kolsky, H., 1956, The Propagation of Stress Pulses in Viscoelastic Solids, Phil. Mag. ser. 8, 1, 693–710.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. McDonald, F. J., Angona, F. A., Mills, R. L., Sengbush, R. L., Van Nostrand, R. G. and White, J. E., 1958, Attenuation of Shear and Compressional Waves in Pierre Shale, Geophysics23, 421–439.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. O'Brien, P. N. S., 1961, A Discussion on the Nature and Magnitude of Elastic Absorption in Seismic Prospecting, Geophys. Prosp.9, 261–275.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Brien, P. N. S. and Lucas, A., 1971, Velocity Dispersion in Seismic Waves, Geophys. Prosp.19, 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Savage, J. C. and Hasegawa, H. S., 1967, Evidence for a Linear Attenuation Mechanism, Geophysics32, 1003–1014.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tullos, F. N. and Reid, A. C., 1969, Seismic Attenuation of Gulf Coast Sediments, Geophysics34, 516–528.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1973.tb00042.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error