1887
Volume 23 Number 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

Vibroseis deconvolution can be performed either before or after correlation. As regards the deconvolution before correlation, the Vibroseis deconvolution operator can be described as convolution of a spike deconvolution operator with a minimum‐phase filter operator with bandpass properties. As regards the deconvolution after correlation, the deconvolution operator can be shown to be the convolution of three operators: spike deconvolution operator and two‐fold convolution with a minimum phase operator. Time‐varying Vibroseis deconvolution can particularly well be described and performed after correlation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1975.tb01534.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berndt, H. and Cooper, G. R., 1965, An Optimum Observation Time for Estimates of Time‐Varying Correlation Functions. IEEE-Transaction on Information Theory, IT‐11, 307–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Burns, W. R., 1968, A Statistically Optimized Deconvolution.. Geophysics33, 255–263.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Clarke, G. K. C., 1968, Time‐Varying Deconvolution Filters.. Geophysics33, 936–944.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ford, W. T. and Hearne, J. H., 1966, Least Squares Inverse Filtering.. Geophysics31, 917–930.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Foster, M. R., Sengbush, R. L. and Watson, R. J., 1968, Use of Monte Carlo Techniques in Optimum Design of the Deconvolution Process.. Geophysics33, 945–949.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Futtermann, W., 1962, Dispersive Body Waves.. Journ. Geophys. Research67, 5279–5292.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gurbuz, B. M., 1972, Signal Enhancement of Vibratory Source Data in the Presence of Attenuation.. Geophysical Prospecting20, 421–438.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Knopoff, L., 1956, The Seismic Pulse in Materials Possessing Solid Friction. I Plane Waves: Bulletin of Seismological Society of America46, 175–183.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Landrum, R. A., 1972, Wiener Filter Compression of Vibroseis Signals. 42nd SEG‐Meeting, Anaheim.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Papoulis, A., 1965, Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. McGraw‐Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Robinson, E. A. and Treitel, S., 1967, Principles of Digital Wiener Filtering.. Geophysical Prospecting15, 312–333.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Robinson, E. A., 1967, Predictive Decomposition of Time Series with Application to Seismic Exploration.. Geophysics32, 418–484.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Robinson, E. A., 1967, Statistical Communication and Detection with Special Reference to Digital Data Processing of Radar and Seismic Signals. Griffin, London .
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Seriff, A. J. and Kim, W. H., 1970, The Effect of Harmonic Distortion in the Use of Vibratory Surface Sources.. Geophysics35, 234–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Treitel, S. and Robinson, E. A., 1966, The Design of High Resolution Filters.. IEEE-Transaction Geoscience Electronics4, 25–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Treitel, S. and Robinson, E. A., 1969, Optimum Digital Filters for Signal to Noise Ratio Enhancement.. Geophysical Prospecting17, 248–293.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Turin, G. L., 1957, On the Estimation in the Presence of Noise of the Impulse Response of a Random, Linear Filter.. IRE Trans. on Information Theory45, 5–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, R. J., 1969, The Determination of Optimum Gate Lengths for Time‐Varying Wiener Filtering.. Geophysics34, 683–695.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1975.tb01534.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error