1887
Volume 27 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

Basic Laterolog devices employ a measure‐current focusing technique to provide well logs of formation resistivity that feature sharp vertical definition combined with a depth of investigation much improved over those of normals of comparable spacings.

To develop the concept of measure‐current focusing, a disk‐electrode arrangement analogous to a guard‐ring capacitor is considered first, leading finally to consideration of a real sonde in a cylindrical borehole. In the latter, auxiliary currents are adjusted to maintain substantially at zero the vertical potential gradients above and below the central measure‐current electrode; this has the effect of focusing the measure‐current beam.

However, prediction of sonde responses on the basis of current patterns can in some cases be misleading. Indeed, for a given Laterolog array, one may use a (reciprocalmode) current pattern radically different from the one defined by the basic (direct‐mode) measure‐current focusing scheme and still obtain the same resistivity measurement. This feature is illustrated for Laterolog 3 by use of transfer impedances, and demonstrated for certain more general cases using the reciprocity theorem.

Comparisons of Laterolog responses across typical thin beds, both non‐invaded and invaded, with those of normal devices of a comparable range of spacings illustrate the improved vertical resolution obtained with Laterolog devices. The examples also show the different magnitudes of the auxiliary currents (thenceforth designated “bucking”‐ or “focusing” currents) used in the direct and reciprocal modes and illustrate how these currents must continuously vary in order to maintain the focused condition as the sonde moves through the bed.

Finally, briefly considering possible applications of Laterolog‐type arrays in surface prospecting, it is shown that a one‐dimensional array laid out on the surface does not provide the same degree of measure‐current focusing as is obtained in a borehole. Some improvement is obtained with a combination of two crossed linear arrays. Much more is obtained using a circular array.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1979.tb01006.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dakhnov, V. N., 1959, Geophysical Well Logging, Quarterly of Colorado School of Mines, V. 57, No. 2 (April 1962) (Translated from Russian by G. V. Keller.).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Doll, H. G., 1951, The Laterolog: A New Resistivity Logging Method with Electrodes Using an Automatic Focusing System: Transactions AIME 192, 305–316. Also in Jour. Petroleum Technology, November 1951.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Guyod, H., 1964, Factors Affecting the Responses of Laterolog‐type Logging Systems (LL3 and LL7), Transactions AIME 231, I211–219. Also in Jour. Petroleum Technology, February 1964.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Owen, J. E. and Greer, W. J., 1951, The Guard Electrode System, Transactions AIME 192, 347–356. Also in Jour. Petroleum Technology, December 1951.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Roy, A., 1975, New Results in Resistivity Well Logging, Geophysical Prospecting23, 426–448.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Roy, A. and Apparao, A., 1971, Depth of Investigation in Direct Current Methods, Geophysics36, 943–956.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Schlumberger Limited
    Schlumberger Limited , 1972, Log Interpretation Charts.
  8. Smythe, William R., 1950, Static and Dynamic Electricity, McGraw‐Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1979.tb01006.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error