1887
Volume 29 Number 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

Optimum multichannel filters can be designed to process seismic events falling on hyperbolic moveout curves using the conventional least‐squares method. Contrary to the linear moveout filters, autocorrelation and crosscorrelation functions inherent in the normal equations have to be computed numerically. However, computation times of filter coefficients are comparable to linear moveout operators.

For a given source‐receiver geometry and assuming straight ray‐path, relative moveout of a seismic reflection event is dependent on the two way arrival time and rms velocity. Consequently, to avoid overlapping of pass and reject moveout windows, hyperbolic moveout filters have to be designed over time gates rather than for the whole record lengths. Hyperbolic and hyperbolic‐linear moveout filters applied to synthetic and field seismic reflection traces show good signal‐to‐noise (S/N) ratio improvements. Results of some combined synthetic and field data examples are presented.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb00704.x
2006-04-27
2020-05-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Burg, J.P.1964, Three dimensional filtering with an array of seismometers, Geophysics29, 693–713.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cassano, E. and ROCCA, F.1973, Multichannel linear filters for optimum rejection of multiple reflections, Geophysics38, 1053–1061.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cassano, E. and Rocca, F.1974, After‐stack multichannel filters without mixing effects, Geophysical Prospecting22, 330–344.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Curtis, J.W.1971, Progress report to B.P. Research Centre, Exploration Division, London , Report 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. D'Hoeraene, J.1966, Filtrage spatio temporal des courbures, Geophysical Prospecting14, 27–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Foster, M.R., Sengbush, R.L. and Watson, R.J.1964, Design of suboptimum filter systems for multitrace seismic data processing, Geophysical Prospecting12, 173–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Galbraith, J.N. and Wiggins, R.A.1968, Characteristic of optimum multichannel stacking filters, Geophysics33, 36–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hubral, P.1970, Some characteristics and applications of a general purpose optimum multichannel stacking filter, PhD thesis, London University.
  9. Hubral, P.1972, Three‐dimensional optimum multichemical velocity filters, Geophysical Prospecting20, 28–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hubral, P.1974, Stacking filters and their characterization in the (f, k) domain, Geophysical Prospecting22, 722–735.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hubral, P.1975, Characteristics of azimuth dependent optimum velocity filters designed for two‐dimensional arrays, Journal of Geophysics41, 265–279.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Meyerhoff, H.J.1966, Horizontal stacking and multichannel filtering applied to common depth point seismic data, Geophysical Prospecting14, 441–454.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Naess, O.E.1979, Superstack—An iterative stacking algorithm, Geophysical Prospecting27, 16–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Oloriniwo, M.A.1973, The design and performance of multidimensional velocity filters with reference to bandvarying signals, PhD thesis, London University.
  15. ÖZdemir, H.1977, Design of multichannel nonrecursive digital filters with applications to seismic reflection data, PhD thesis, London University.
  16. Robinson, E.A.1963, Mathematical development of discrete filters for the detection of nuclear explosions, Journal of Geophysical Research68, 5559–5567.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Robinson, E.A.1967, Multichannel Time Series Analysis with Digital Computer Programs, Holden‐Day, Inc., San Francisco .
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schneider, W.A., Larner, K.L., Burg, J.P. and Backus, M.M.1964, A new data processing technique for the elimination of ghost arrivals on reflection seismograms, Geophysics29, 783–805.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Schneider, W.A., Prince, E.R. and Giles, B.F.1965, A new data processing technique for multiple attenuation exploiting differential normal moveout, Geophysics30, 348–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sengbush, R.L. and Foster, M.R.1968, Optimum multichannel velocity filters, Geophysics33, 11–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Treitel, S.1970, Principles of digital multichannel filters, Geophysics35, 785–811.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb00704.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error