1887
Volume 29 Number 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

An underground gravity study was carried out under extreme conditions of the Alpine regions. The lead–zinc mine Bleiberg, Carinthia, was selected as an example to show the possibilities and limitations of the subsurface gravity method. For density determinations, gravity measurements were made in two vertical mine shafts passing through Triassic sedimentary rocks of the Bleiberg Unit. The main prblem in gravity data reduction in extremely rugged topography is the accurate calculation of the terrain effect on underground stations. A general discussion of the various corrections required for the gravity measurements in the mine is presented. The mean interval densities in the two shafts, in limestone, dolomite, and schists formations, were determined as 2.76 and 2.77 g/cm3, respectively, with an accuracy of better than 0.01 g/cm3 for a depth interval of 50 m. The interval densities provide valuable information about the lithological and structural changes in the shaft surroundings and also agree well with the representative hand sample densities.

In the second part, the applications of subsurface horizontal gravity surveys in exploration are discussed. Since the influence of topography is less underground because of the greater distance to the surface, subsurface surveys have definite advantages over surface surveys and can be very helpful in locating anomalous density zones in the mines. An example of gravity survey with a station spacing of 10 m at a depth of about 540 m is presented.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb01021.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Algermissen, S.T.1961, Underground and surface gravity survey, Leadwood, Missouri, Geophysics26, 158–168.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, W.J., Jr.1956, The gravity meter in underground prospecting, American Institute of Mining Engineers, Transactions, March 293–295.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bechstädt, Th.1978, Faziesanalyse permischer und triadischer Sedimente des Drauzuges als Hinweis auf eine groβräumige Lateralverschiebung innerhalb des Ostalpins, Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 121, Heft 1, 1–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beyer, L.A. and Corbato, C.E.1972, A FORTRAN IV computer program for calculating borehole gravity terrain corrections, U.S. Geological Survey report PB 2‐08674.
  5. Domzalski, W.1954, Gravity measurements in a vertical shaft, Transactions of the Institute of Mining and Metallurgy63 (571), 429–445.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Domzalski, W.1955, Three‐dimensional gravity survey, Geophysical Prospecting3, 15–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Götze, H.J., Rosenbach, O. and Schöler, W.1979, Gravimetrische Untersuchungen in der östlichen Zentralalpen, Geologischen Rundschau68, 61–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hammer, S.1938, Investigation of the vertical gradient of gravity, Transaction of the American Geophysical Union, Part 1, 72–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hammer, S.1939, Terrain corrections for gravity stations, Geophysics4, 176–183.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hammer, S.1950, Density determinations by underground gravity measurements, Geophysics15, 637–652.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hearst, J.R.1968, Terrain corrections for borehole gravimetry, Geophysics33, 361–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hearst, J.R. and McKague, H.L.1976, Structure elucidation with borehole gravimetry, Geophysics41, 491–505.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heiskanen, W.A. and Vening Meinesz, F.A.1958, The Earth and its Gravity Field, McGraw‐Hill, New York , 151–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hinze, W.J., Bradley, J.W. and Brown, A.R.1978, Gravity survey in The Michigan Basin deep boreholes, Journal of Geophysical Research83, 5864–5868.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Holler, H.1950, Zur Frage des Niedersetzens der Mitterberger Blei‐Zinkvererzung (Kreuzen), Berg‐ und Hütten‐mannische Monatshefte 82–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jung, K.1961, Schwerekraftverfahren in der Angewandten Geophysik, Akademische Verlagsgesellscheftl, Geest und Portig, Leipzig .
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kostelka, L.1965, Eine genetische Gliederung der Blei‐Zinkvererzung sudlich der Drau, CarinthiaII, 29–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kostelka, L.1971, Beiträge zur Geologie der Bleiberger Vererzung und deren Umgebung, CarinthiaII, 63–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. McCulloh, T.H.1965, A confirmation by gravity measurements of an underground density profile on core densities, Geophysics30, 1108–1132.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nettleton, L.L.1939, Determination of density for reduction of gravimeter observations, Geophysics4, 184–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rische, H.1957, Dichtebestimmungen im Gesteinsverband durch Gravimeter‐ und Drehwaagemessungen unter Tage, Freiberger ForschungshefteC 35.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rogers, G.R.1952, Subsurface gravity measurements, Geophysics17, 365–377.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Schleusener, A.1940, Nomogramme für Geländeverbesserung von Gravimetermessungen der angewandten Geophysik, Gerland's Beitrage zur angewaudhen Geophysik8, 415–430.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith, N.J.1950, The case for gravity data from boreholes, Geophysics15, 605–636.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sumner, J.S. and Schnepfe, R.N.1966, Underground gravity surveying at Bisbee, Arizona, Mining Geophysics I, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa , 243–251.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Whetton, J., Myers, J. and Smith, R.1957. Correlation of rock density determinations for gravity survey interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting5, 20–43.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb01021.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error