1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 34, Issue 7
  5. Article
Volume 34 Number 7
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

One of the important properties of a series of primary reflection coefficients is its amplitude distribution. This paper examines the amplitude distribution of primary reflection coefficients generated from a number of block‐averaged well logs with block thicknesses corresponding to 1 ms (two‐way time). The distribution is always essentially symmetric, but has a sharper central peak and larger tails than a Gaussian distribution. Thus any attempt to estimate phase using the bi‐spectrum (third‐order spectrum) is unlikely to be successful, since the third‐order moment is almost identically zero. Complicated tri‐spectrum (fourth‐order spectrum) calculations are thus required. Minimum Entropy Deconvolution (MED) schemes should be able to exploit this form of non‐Gaussianity. However, both these methods assume a white reflectivity sequence; they would therefore mix up the contributions to the trace's spectral shape that are due to the wavelet and those that are due to non‐white reflectivity unless corrections are introduced.

A mixture of two Laplace distributions provides a good fit to the empirical amplitude distributions. Such a mixture distribution fits nicely with sedimentological observations, namely that clear distinctions can be made between and that comprise one or more such beds with the same basic lithology, and that lithological units can be expected to display larger reflection coefficients at their boundaries than sedimentary beds. The geological processes that engender major lithological changes are not the same as those for truncation of bedding. Analyses of sub‐sequences of the reflection series are seen to support this idea. The variation of the mixing proportion parameter allows for scale and shape changes in different segments of the series, and hence provides a more flexible description of the series than the generalized Gaussian distribution which is shown to also provide a good fit to the series.

Both the mixture of two Laplace distributions and the generalized Gaussian distribution can be expressed as scale mixtures of the ordinary Gaussian distribution. This result provides a link with the ordinary Gaussian distribution which might have been expected to be the distribution of a natural series such as reflection coefficients. It is also important in the consideration of the solution of MED‐type methods. It is shown that real (coloured) primary reflection series do not seem to be obtainable as the deconvolution result from MED‐type deconvolution schemes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1986.tb00512.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-27

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1986.tb00512.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agard, J.1961. Ľanalyse statistique et probabiliste des sismogrammes, Revue de ĽInstitut Francais du Pétrole16, 1–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Agard, J. and Grau, G.1961. Etude statistique de sismogrammes, Geophysical Prospecting9, 503–525.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al‐Hussaini, E. and Ahmad, K.1981. On the identifiability of finite mixtures of distributions, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory27, 664–668.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrett, J.F. and Lampard, D.G.1955. An expansion for some second‐order probability distributions and its application to noise problems. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 1, 10–15.
  5. Bernardo, J.1976. Digamma function, Applied Statistics25, 315–317.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chi, C.Y., Mendel, J.M. and Hampson, D.1984. A computationally fast approach to maximum‐likelihood deconvolution, Geophysics49, 550–565.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chu, K.C.1973. Estimation and decision for linear systems with elliptical random processes, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control18, 499–505.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies, N., Spedding, T. and Watson, W.1980. Autoregressive moving average processes with non‐normal residuals, Journal of Time Series Analysis1, 103–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Everitt, B. and Hand, D.1981. Finite Mixture Distributions, Chapman and Hall, London .
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Godfrey, R. and Rocca, F.1981. Zero memory non‐linear deconvolution, Geophysical Prospecting29, 189–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gray, W.1979. Variable norm deconvolution, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
  12. Johnson, N.L. and Kotz, S.1972. Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions, Wiley, New York . LAU, C. 1980, A simple series for the incomplete gamma integral, Applied Statistics 29, 113–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lii, K.S. and Rosenblatt, M.1982. Deconvolution and estimation of transfer function phase and coefficients for non‐Gaussian linear processes, Annals of Statistics10, 1195–1208.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lii, K.S. and Rosenblatt, M.1983. A fourth‐order deconvolution technique for non‐Gaussian linear processes, unpublished manuscript, University of California.
  15. Matsuoka, T. and Ulrych, T.J.1984. Phase estimation using the bi‐spectrum, Proceedings of IEEE72, 1403–1411.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. McGraw, D.K. and Wagner, J.F.1968. Elliptically symmetric distributions, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory14, 110–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mendel, J.M.1983. Optimal Seismic Deconvolution, Academic Press, New York .
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Prescott, P. and Walden, A.T.1983. Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the three‐parameter generalized extreme‐value distribution from censored samples, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation16, 241–250.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rietsch, E.1982. Deconvolution in the presence of noise and a higher than Nyquist signal rate, Geoexploration20, 61–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Schneider, B.E.1978. Trigamma function, Applied Statistics27, 97–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Schwarzacher, W.1975. Sedimentation Models and Quantitative Stratigraphy, Elsevier, Amsterdam .
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Teichroew, D.1957. The mixture of normal distributions with different variances, Annals of Mathematical Statistics28, 510–512.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Walden, A.T.1985. Non‐Gaussian reflectivity, entropy and deconvolution, Geophysics50, 2862–2888.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Walden, A.T. and Hosken, J.W.J.1985. An investigation of the spectral properties of primary reflection coefficients, Geophysical Prospecting33, 400–435.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. West, M.1984. Outlier models and prior distributions in Bayesian linear regression, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series B 46, 431–439.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Wiggins, R.A.1978. Minimum entropy deconvolution, Geoexploration16, 21–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Wilk, M.B. and Gnanadesikan, R.1968. Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data, Biometrika55, 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1986.tb00512.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error