1887
Volume 35 Number 9
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Amplitude versus offset concepts can be used to generate weighted stacking schemes (here called geo‐stack) which can be used in an otherwise standard seismic data processing sequence to display information about rock properties.

The Zoeppritz equations can be simplified and several different approximations appear in the literature. They describe the variation of P‐wave reflection coefficients with the angle of incidence of a P‐wave as a function of the P‐wave velocities, the S‐wave velocities and the densities above and below an interface.

Using a smooth, representative interval velocity model (from boreholes or velocity analyses) and assuming no dip, the angle of incidence can be found as a function of time and offset by iterative ray tracing. In particular, the angle of incidence can be computed for each sample in a normal moveout corrected CMP gather. The approximated Zoeppritz equation can then be fitted to the amplitudes of all the traces at each time sample of the gather, and certain rock properties can be estimated. The estimation of the rock properties is achieved by the application of time‐ and offset‐variant weights to the data samples before stacking. The properties which can be displayed by geo‐stack are: P‐wave reflectivity (or true zero‐offset reflectivity), S‐wave reflectivity, and the reflectivity of P‐wave velocity divided by S‐wave velocity (or ‘pseudo‐Poisson's ratio reflectivity’). If assumptions are made about the relation between P‐wave velocity and S‐wave velocity for water‐bearing clastic silicate rocks, then it is possible to create a display which highlights the presence of gas.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1987.tb00856.x
2006-04-27
2020-04-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K. and Richards, P.G.1979. Quantitative Seismology, W.H. Freeman and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bortfeld, R.1961. Approximation to the reflection and transmission coefficients of plane longitudinal and transverse waves, Geophysical Prospecting9, 485–502.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Castagna, J.P., Batzle, M.L. and Eastwood, R.L.1985. Relationships between compressional‐wave and shear‐wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks, Geophysics50, 571–581.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Denham, L.R., Palmeira, R.A.R. and Farrell, R.C.1985. The zero offset stack, 55th SEG meeting, Washington D.C., Expanded Abstracts, 624–625.
  5. Gardner, G.H.F., Gardner, L.W. and Gregory, A.R.1974. Formation velocity and density–the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps, Geophysics39, 770–780.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gassaway, G.S. and Richgels, H.J.1983. SAMPLE: seismic amplitude measurement for primary lithology estimation, 53rd SEG meeting, Las Vegas, Expanded Abstracts, 610–613.
  7. Koefoed, O.1955. On the effect of Poisson's ratio of rock strata on the reflection coefficients of plane waves, Geophysical Prospecting3, 381–387.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ostrander, W.J.1984. Plane‐wave reflection coefficients for gas sands at nonnormal angles of incidence, Geophysics49, 1637–1648.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Shuey, R.T.1985. A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations, Geophysics50, 609–614.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Stolt, R.H. and Weglein, A.B.1985. Migration and inversion of seismic data, Geophysics50, 2458–2472.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wiggins, R., Kenny, G.S. and Mc Clure, C.D.1984. A method for determining and displaying the shear‐wave reflectivities of a geologic formation, European patent application (Mobil Oil Corporation).
  12. Yu, G.1985. Offset‐amplitude variation and controlled‐amplitude processing, Geophysics50, 2697–2708.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1987.tb00856.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error