1887
Volume 42 Number 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

Improving the accuracy of NMO corrections and of the corresponding interval velocities entails implementing a better approximation than the formula used since the beginning of seismic processing. The exact equations are not practical as they include many unknowns. The approximate expression has only two unknowns, the reflection time and the rms velocity, but becomes inaccurate for large apertures of the recording system and heterogeneous vertical velocities. Several methods of improving the accuracy have been considered, but the gains do not compensate for the dramatic increase in computing time. Two alternative equations are proposed: the first containing two parameters, the reflection time and the focusing time, is not valid for apertures much greater than is the standard formula, but has a much faster computing time and does not stretch the far traces; the other, containing three parameters, the reflection time, like focusing time and the tuning velocity, retains high frequencies for apertures about twice those allowed by the standard equation. Its computing time can be kept within the same limits. NMO equations, old and new, are designed strictly for horizontal layering, but remain reliable as long as the rays travel through the same layers in both the down and up directions.

An equation, similar to Dix's formula, is given to compute the interval velocities. The entire scheme can be automated to produce interval‐velocity sections without manual picking.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00222.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al‐ChalabiM.1973. Series approximation in velocity and traveltime computations. Geophysical Prospecting21, 783–795.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al‐ChalabiM.1974. An analysis of stacking, rms, average, and interval velocities over a horizontally layered ground. Geophysical Prospecting22, 458–475.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CastleR.J.1988. Shifted hyperbolas and normal moveout. 58th SEG meeting, Anaheim, Expanded Abstracts, 894–896.
  4. De BazelaireE.1988. Normal moveout revisited: inhomogeneous media and curved interfaces. Geophysics53, 143–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DixC.H.1955. Seismic velocities from surface measurements. Geophysics20, 68–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. GidlowP.M. & FattiJ.L.1990. Preserving far offset seismic data using non‐hyperbolic moveout correction. 60th SEG meeting, San Francisco, Expanded Abstracts, 1726–1729.
  7. HubralP. & KreyTh.1980. Interval Velocities from Time Measurements. SEG, Tulsa
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MayB.T. & StraleyD.K.1979. Higher‐order moveout spectra. Geophysics44, 1193–1207.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ShahP.M. & LevinF.K.1973. Gross properties of time‐distance curves. Geophysics38, 643–656.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SlotnickM.M.1959. Lessons in Seismic Computing. SEG, Tulsa
    [Google Scholar]
  11. TanerM.T. & KoehlerF.1969. Velocity spectra—digital computer derivation and application of velocity functions. Geophysics34, 859–881.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ThoreP. & De BazelaireE.1991. Analysis of the common midpoint gather by decomposition into elementary wavefronts. Geophysical Prospecting39, 453–472.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ThoreP., De BazelaireE. & RayM.P.1994. The three‐parameter equation: an efficient tool to enhance the stack. Geophysics59, 297–308.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00222.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error