Reply to Comment on ‘Three‐dimensional interpretation of multiple‐source bipole‐dipole resistivity data using the apparent resistivity tensor’ by X. Li and L. B. Pedersen1

Reply to Comment on ‘Three‐dimensional interpretation of multiple‐source bipole‐dipole resistivity data using the apparent resistivity tensor’ by X. Li and L. B. Pedersen¹
By H.M. Bibby¹
View Affiliations Hide Affiliations

Affiliations: ¹ Institute of Geological and Nuclear Science, PO Box 1320, Wellington, New Zealand.
Source: Geophysical Prospecting, Volume 42, Issue 5, Jun 1994, p. 527 - 529
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00227.x
- Published online: 27 Apr 2006

There is no abstract available.

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00227.x

2006-04-27

2024-04-26

Full text loading...

References

BibbyH.M.1977. The apparent resistivity tensor. Geophysics42, 1258–1261.
[Google Scholar]
BibbyH.M. and HohmannG.W.1993. Three‐dimensional interpretation of multiple‐source bipole‐dipole resistivity data using the apparent resistivity tensor. Geophysical Prospecting41, 693–723.
[Google Scholar]
LiX. and PedersenL.B.1994. Comment on ‘Three‐dimensional interpretation of multiple‐source bipole‐dipole resistivity using the apparent resistivity tensor’ by H.M. Bibby and G.W. Hohmann. Geophysical Prospecting42, 525–526 (this issue).
[Google Scholar]

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00227.x

Reply to Comment on ‘Three‐dimensional interpretation of multiple‐source bipole‐dipole resistivity data using the apparent resistivity tensor’ by X. Li and L. B. Pedersen¹