Reply to Comment on ‘Three‐dimensional interpretation of multiple‐source bipole‐dipole resistivity data using the apparent resistivity tensor‘by D. Doicin¹

References

1. BibbyH.M.1977. The apparent resistivity tensor. Geophysics42, 1258–1261.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BibbyH.M.1986. Analysis of multiple‐source bipole‐dipole resistivity surveys using the apparent resistivity tensor. Geophysics51, 972–983.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BibbyH.M. and Hohmann, G.W.1993. Three‐dimensional interpretation of multiple‐source bipole‐dipole resistivity data using the apparent resistivity tensor. Geophysical Prospecting41, 697–723.
   [Google Scholar]
4. CaldwellT.G. & BibbyH.M.1993. A comparison of electromagnetic methods with the DC resistivity multiple‐source bipole‐dipole method for deep geothermal exploration. Proceedings of the 15th New Zealand geothermal workshop. University of Auckland, Auckland, pp. 187–194.
5. DoicinD.1976. Quadripole‐quadripole arrays for direct current measurements‐model studies. Geophysics41, 79–96.
   [Google Scholar]
6. DoicinD.1977. Two‐fold resistivity mapping of lateral inhomogeneities. Geophysics42, 1473–1477.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DoicinD.1994. Comment on ‘Three‐dimensional interpretation of multiple‐source bipole‐dipole resistivity using the apparent resistivity tensor’ by H.M. Bibby and G.W. Hohmann. Geophysical Prospecting42, 531–535 (this issue).
   [Google Scholar]
8. KellerG.V. and FurgersonR.B.1977. Determining the resistivity of a resistant layer in the crust. American Geophysical Union Geophysics Monograph20, 440–469.
   [Google Scholar]
9. StefanescuS.1950. Modèles théoriques de milieux hétérogènes pour les méthodes de prospection électrique à courants stationnaries. Comitetul Geologic, Studii tehnice si economice4, 212–247.
   [Google Scholar]