1887
Volume 43 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abctract

There are two forms of systematic error in conventional deconvolution as applied to the problem of suppressing multiples with periodicities longer than a hundred milliseconds. One of these is the windowing effect due to the assumption that a true autocorrelation function can be computed from a finite portion of data. The second form of error concerns the assumption of periodicity, which is strictly true only at zero offset for a 1D medium. The seriousness of these errors increased with the lengthening of the multiple period.

This paper describes and illustrates a rigorous 2D solution to the predictive deconvolution equations that overcomes both of the systematic errors of conventional 1D approaches. This method is applicable to both the simple or trapped system and to the complex or peg‐leg system of multiples. It does not require that the design window be six to ten times larger compared to the operator dimensions and it is accurate over a wide range of propagation angles. The formulation is kept strictly in the sense of the classical theory of prediction. The solution of normal equations are obtained by a modified conjugate gradient method of solution developed by Koehler. In this algorithm, the normal equations are not modified by the autocorrelation approximation.

As with all linear methods, approximate stationary attitude in the multiple generating process is assumed. This method has not been tested in areas where large changes in the characteristic of the multiple‐generating mechanism occur within a seismic spread length.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00261.x
2006-04-28
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BerkhoutA.J. and ZaanenP.R.1976. A comparison between Wiener filtering, Kalman filtering and Deterministic Least Squares Estimation. Geophysical Prospecting24, 141–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berryhill, J.R. and KimY.C.1986. Deep‐water peg‐legs and multiples: emulation and suppression. Geophysicsxs51, 2177–2184.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Davies, E.B. and MercadoE. J.1968. Multichannel deconvolution filtering of field recorded seismic data. Geophysics33, 711–722.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. KoehlerF and TanerM.T.1985. The use of conjugate‐gradient algorithm in the computation of predictive deconvolution operators. Geophysics50, 2752–2758.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. LoewenthalD., LuL., RobertsonR. and SherwoodJ.W.C.1976. The wave equation applied to migration. Geophysical Prospecting24, 380–399.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. PeacockK.L. and TreitelS.1969. Predictive deconvolution: theory and practice. Geophysics34, 155–169.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. RobinsonE.A.1954. Predictive decomposition of time‐series with application to seismic exploration. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
  8. RobinsonE.A.1966. Multichannel z‐transforms and minimum delay. Geophysics31, 482–500.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. RobinsonE.A. and TreitelS.1967. Principals of digital Wiener filtering. Geophysical Prospecting15, 311–333.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SchneiderW.A., LarnerK.L., BurgJ.P. and BackusM.M.1964. A new data‐processing technique for elimination of ghost arrivals on reflection seismograms. Geophysics29, 783–805.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SchneiderW.A., PrinceE.R. and GilesB.F.1965. A new data processing technique for multiple attenuation exploiting the differential normal moveout. Geophysics30, 348–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. TanerM.T.1980. Long period sea‐floor multiples and their suppression. Geophysical Prospecting28, 30–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. VerschuurD. J., BerkhoutA. J. and WapenaarC.P.A.1992. Adaptive surface‐related multiple elimination. Geophysics57, 1166–1177.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. WangR.J. and TreitelS.1973. The determination of Wiener filters by means of gradient methods. Geophysics38, 310–326.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. WigginsJ.W.1988. Attenuation of complex water‐bottom multiples by wave‐equation based prediction and subtraction. Geophysics53, 1527–1539.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00261.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error