1887
Volume 43 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

Results from walkaway VSP and shale laboratory experiments show that shale anisotropy can be significantly anelliptic. Heterogeneity and anellipticity both lead to non‐hyperbolic moveout curves and the resulting ambiguity in velocity analysis is investigated for the case of a factorizable anisotropic medium with a linear dependence of velocity on depth. More information can be obtained if there are several reflectors. The method of Dellinger . for anisotropic velocity analysis in layered transversely isotropic media is examined and is shown to be restricted to media having relatively small anellipticity. A new scheme, based on an expansion of the inverse‐squared group velocity in spherical harmonics, is presented. This scheme can be used for larger anellipticity, and is applicable for horizontal layers having monoclinic symmetry with the symmetry plane parallel to the layers. The method is applied to invert the results of anisotropic ray tracing on a model Sand/shale sequence. For transversely isotropic media with small anisotropy, the scheme reduces to the method of Byun . and Byun and Corrigan. The expansion in spherical harmonics allows the P‐phase slowness surface of each layer to be determined in analytic form from the layer parameters obtained by inversion without the need to assume that the anisotropy is weak.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00266.x
2006-04-28
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BanikN.C.1984. Velocity anisotropy in shales and depth estimation in the North Sea Basin. Geophysics49, 1411–1419.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ByunB.S. and CorriganD.1990. Seismic travel time inversion for transverse isotropy. Geophysics54, 192–200.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ByunB.S., CorriganD. and GaiserJ.E.1989. Anisotropic velocity analysis for lithology discrimination. Geophysics54, 1564–1574.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CarrionP., CostaJ., Ferrer PinheiroJ.E. and SchoenbergM.1992. Cross‐borehole tomography in anisotropic media. Geophysics57, 1194–1198.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ČervenýV.1989. Ray tracing in factorized anisotropic inhomogeneous media. Geophysical Journal International99, 91–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DellingerJ., MuirF. and KarrenbachM.1993. Anelliptic approximations for TI media. Journal of Seismic Exploration2, 23–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DixC.H.1955. Seismic velocities from surface measurements. Geophysics20, 68–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. FederovF.I.1968. Theory of Elastic Waves in Crystals. Plenum Press, New York .
    [Google Scholar]
  9. FripiatJ.J. and SettonR.1987. Cohesion energy in anisotropic particles aqueous slurries. Journal of Applied Physics61, 1811–1815.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GassmanF.1964. Introduction to seismic travel‐time methods in anisotropic media. Pure and Applied Geophysics58, 53–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. JonesL.E.A. and WangH.F.1981. Ultrasonic velocities in Cretaceous shales from the Williston basin. Geophysics46, 288–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LarnerK.L.1993. Dip‐moveout error in transversely isotropic media with linear velocity variation with depth. Geophysics58, 1442–1453.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LarnerK.L. and CohenJ.K.1993. Migration error in transversely isotropic media with linear velocity variation with depth. Geophysics58, 1454–1467.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MillerD.E., LeaneyS. and BorlandW.1993. An in‐situ estimation of anisotropic elastic moduli for a submarine shale. 55th EAEG meeting, Stavanger, Norway, Extended Abstract, C029.
  15. RoeR. J.1965. Description of crystallite orientation in polycrystalline materials‐III: General solution to pole figure inversion. Journal of Applied Physics36, 2024–2031.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SayersC.M.1988. Inversion of ultrasonic wave velocity measurements to obtain the microcrack orientation distribution function in rocks. Ultrasonics26, 73–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SayersC.M.1993. Anelliptic approximations for shales. Journal of Seismic Exploration2, 319–331.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SayersC.M.1994a. The elastic anisotropy of shales. Journal of Geophysical Research99, 767–774.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SayersC.M.1994b. P‐wave propagation in weakly anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International116, 799–805.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SenaA.G.1989. Seismic travel time equations for azimuthally anisotropic and isotropic media: Estimation of interval elastic properties. Geophysics56, 2090–2101.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ShearerP.M. and ChapmanC.H.1988. Ray tracing in anisotropic media with a linear gradient. Geophysical Journal94, 575–580.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. WintersteinD.F.1986. Anisotropy effects in P‐wave and SH‐wave stacking velocities contain information on lithology. Geophysics51, 661–672.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00266.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error