4D technology: where are we, and where are we going?

References

1. BarkvedO.I., KommedalJ.H. and ThomsenL.2004. The role of multi‐component seismic data in developing the Valhall Field, Norway. 66th EAGE conference, Paris , France , Extended Abstracts, E040.
2. EikenO., HaugenG.U., SchonewilleM. and DuijndamA.2003. A proven method for acquiring highly repeatable towed streamer seismic data. Geophysics68, 1303–1309.DOI: 10.1190/1.1598123
   [Google Scholar]
3. GuderianK., KleemeyerM., KjeldstadA., PetterssonS.E. and RehlingJ.2003. Draugen Field – successful reservoir management using 4D seismic. 65th EAGE conference, Stavanger , Norway , Expanded Abstracts, A01.
4. HallS.A., MacBethC., BarkvedO.I. and WildP.2005. Cross‐matching with interpreted warping of 3D streamer and 3D ocean‐bottom‐cable data at Valhall for time‐lapse assessment. Geophysical Prospecting53, 283–297.
   [Google Scholar]
5. LandrøM.1999. Repeatability issues of 3‐D VSP data. Geophysics64, 1673–1679.
   [Google Scholar]
6. NesO.M., HoltR.M. and FjaerE.2000. The reliability of core data as input to seismic reservoir monitoring studies. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE No. 65180.
   [Google Scholar]
7. O'BrienJ., KilbrideF. and LimF.2004. Time‐lapse 3D VSP monitoring of a CO2 EOR flood. 74th SEG meeting, Denver , USA , Expanded Abstracts, TL 2.8.
8. VascoD.W. and Datta‐GuptaA.2001. Asymptotics, streamlines, and reservoir modelling: a pathway to production tomography. The Leading Edge20, 1164–1171.
   [Google Scholar]