Interpretation of magnetic data using analytic signal derivatives

References

1. Atchuta RaoD., Ram BabuH.V. and Sanker NarayanP.V.1981. Interpretation of magnetic anomalies due to dikes: The complex gradient method. Geophysics46,1572–1578.DOI: 10.1190/1.1441164
   [Google Scholar]
2. BastaniM. and PedersenL.B.2001. Automatic interpretation of magnetic dike parameters using the analytic signal technique. Geophysics66,551–561.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BlakelyR.J.1995. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications . Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. DebegliaN. and CorpelJ.1997. Automatic 3‐D interpretation of potential field data using analytic signal derivatives. Geophysics62,87–96.DOI: 10.1190/1.1444149
   [Google Scholar]
5. HsuS.K., CoppensD. and ShyuC.T.1998. Depth to magnetic source using the generalized analytic signal. Geophysics63,1947–1957.DOI: 10.1190/1.1444488
   [Google Scholar]
6. HsuS.K., SibuetJ.C. and ShyuC.T.1996. High‐resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential anomalies: An enhanced analytic signal technique. Geophysics61,373–386.DOI: 10.1190/1.1443966
   [Google Scholar]
7. KirkhamK.2001. Investigations of a high‐resolution aeromagnetic survey over the southeastern portion of the Illinois Basin . MSc thesis, Southern Illinois University , Carbondale .
8. MacLeodI.N., JonesK. and DaiT.F.1993. 3‐D analytic signal in the interpretation of total magnetic field data at low magnetic latitudes. Exploration Geophysics24,679–688.
   [Google Scholar]
9. NabighianM.N.1972. The analytic signal of two‐dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross‐section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics37,507–517.DOI: 10.1190/1.1440276
   [Google Scholar]
10. RoestW.R., VerhoefJ. and PilkingtonM.1992. Magnetic interpretation using 3‐D analytic signal. Geophysics57,116–125.DOI: 10.1190/1.1443174
    [Google Scholar]
11. SalemA., ElsirafiA. and UshijimaK.1999. Design and application of high‐resolution aeromagnetic survey over Gebel Duwi area and its offshore extension, Egypt. Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University59(3), 201–213.
    [Google Scholar]
12. SalemA. and RavatD.2003. A combined analytic signal and Euler method (AN‐EUL) for automatic interpretation of magnetic data. Geophysics68,1952–1961.DOI: 10.1190/1.1635049
    [Google Scholar]
13. SalemA., RavatD., MushayandebvuM.F. and UshijimaK.2004. Linearized least‐squares method for interpretation of potential‐field data from sources of simple geometry. Geophysics69,783–788.DOI: 10.1190/1.1759464
    [Google Scholar]
14. ThompsonD.T.1982. 'EULDPH' – a new technique for making computer‐assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics47,31–37.DOI: 10.1190/1.1441278
    [Google Scholar]
15. ThurstonJ.B. and SmithR.S.1997. Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, susceptibility contrast using the SPI(tm) method. Geophysics62,807–813.DOI: 10.1190/1.1444190
    [Google Scholar]
16. ThurstonJ.B., SmithR.S. and GuillonJ. 2002. A multimodel method for depth estimation from magnetic data. Geophysics67,555–561.DOI: 10.1190/1.1468616
    [Google Scholar]