1887
Volume 53 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Results of an experimental study of shear‐ and compressional‐wave propagation in an orthorhombically anisotropic medium are presented. The experiments were performed on a physical model consisting of two sets of fractures. The first set consisted of orientated rubber inclusions simulating weak material‐filled cracks. The second set consisted of a system of closely spaced parallel fractures simulated by thin plates of epoxy resin, superimposed orthogonally on the first set. Three cases of fracture orientations within the model were identified and studied. Case 1 is analogous to a jointed fracture reservoir with one vertical set of fluid‐filled cracks or fractures and one non‐filled horizontal set. This case is referred to as JFV. Case 2 is analogous to a double fracture reservoir with one horizontal set of fluid‐filled fractures or cracks and one non‐filled vertical set. This is referred to as DFH. Case 3 is analogous to a double fracture reservoir with two vertical sets of fractures or cracks, with only one fluid‐filled. Case 3 is referred to as DFV. A pulse transmission method was performed on all three modelled cases along the three principal axes. A directional variation in the compressional‐ and shear‐wave velocities, as well as distinct shear‐wave splitting, was observed. The elastic constants for each case were determined and differences between them were noted and compared with the controlled results of both layered (transverse isotropy, TI) and vertically fractured (azimuthally anisotropic models, VF) media. The differences in elastic moduli and velocities indicate the potential of recognizing the different fracture orientations and suggest an approach to designing a method of drilling to further enhance oil recovery and reservoir exploitation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00437.x
2004-12-23
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ass'adJ.M., McDonaldJ.A., ThathamR.H. and KuskyT.M.1996. Elastic wave propagation in a medium with oriented inclusions. Geophysical Journal International125,163–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ass'adJ.M., ThathamR.H. and McDonaldJ.A.1992. A physical model study of micro‐cracks‐induced anisotropy. Geophysics57,1562–1570.DOI: 10.1190/1.1443224
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BackusG.E.1962. Long‐wave anisotropy produced by horizontal layering. Journal of Geophysical Research67,4427–4440.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BakulinA., GrechkaV. and TsvankinI.2000. Estimation of fracture parameters from reflection seismic data – Part II: Fractured models with orthorhombic symmetry. Geophysics65,1803–1817.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BerrymanJ.G.1979. Theory of elastic properties of composite materials. Applied Physics Letters35,856–858.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CheadleS.P., BrownR.J. and LawtonD.C.1991. Orthorhombic anisotropy: a physical seismic modeling study. Geophysics57,1603–1613.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ChiH.C. and SpencerW.T.1990. Velocity characteristics of P‐waves in anisotropy. 60th SEG meeting, San Francisco , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1381–1385.
  8. CrampinS.1985. Evidence for aligned cracks in the earth's crust. First Break3,12–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CrampinS., BoothD.C., EvansR., PeacockS. and FletcherJ.B.1990. Changes in shear wave splitting near the time of the North Palm Springs earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research95b,11197–11212.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CrampinS., ChesnokovE.M. and HipkinR.G.1984. Seismic anisotropy: The state of the art. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society76,1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HelbigK. and SchoenbergM.1987. Anomalous polarization of elastic waves in transversely isotropic media. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America81,1235–1245.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HoodJ.A. and MignognaR.B.1993. Experimental separation of constituent anisotropies using contact measurements. Geophysics35,333–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MullerM.C.1991. Prediction of lateral variability in fracture intensity using multi‐component shear‐wave surface seismic as a precursor to horizontal drilling in the Austin Chalk. Geophysical Journal International107,409–415.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. PostmaG.W.1955. Wave propagation in a stratified medium. Geophysics20,780–806.DOI: 10.1190/1.1438187
    [Google Scholar]
  15. SayerC.M. and RickettJ.E.1997. Azimuthal variation of AVO response for fractured gas sands. Geophysics65,165–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SchoenbergM. and DoumaJ.1988. Elastic wave propagation in media with parallel fractures and aligned cracks. Geophysical Prospecting36,571–590.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SchoenbergM. and MuirF.1989. A calculus for finely layered anisotropic media. Geophysics54,581–589.DOI: 10.1190/1.1442685
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SlawinskiM.A., SlawinskiR.A., BrownJ.R. and ParkinJ.M.2000. A generalized form of Snell's law in anisotropic media. Geophysics65,632–637.DOI: 10.1190/1.1444759
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51,1954–1966.DOI: 10.1190/1.1442051
    [Google Scholar]
  20. TsvankinI.1997. Anisotropic parameters and P‐wave velocity for orthorhombic media. Geophysics62,1292–1309.DOI: 10.1190/1.1444231
    [Google Scholar]
  21. WangC.Y. and SunY.1990. Oriented micro‐fractures in Cajon Pass Drill Cores: Stress field near the San Andreas Fault. Journal of Geophysical Research95(11), 135–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. YardleyG.Y. and CrampinS.1993. Shear‐wave anisotropy in the Austin Chalk, Texas, from multi‐offset VSP data: Case studies. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics29,163–176.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00437.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00437.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error