1887
Volume 53, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We present a new least‐squares migration method called least‐squares wave‐path migration. The proposed method combines an iterative conjugate‐gradient solver with a stationary‐phase wave‐path migration operator. Numerical tests demonstrate that (i) least‐squares wave‐path migration is computationally more efficient than and almost as accurate as Kirchhoff least‐squares migration, and (ii) many of the artefacts seen in wave‐path migration images are suppressed after several conjugate‐gradient iterations. Previous results have shown that 3D wave‐path migration is up to 100 times faster than a standard 3D Kirchhoff migration, but sometimes at the cost of reduced quality. With the proposed least‐squares wave‐path migration method, the image quality in wave‐path migration can be improved at an acceptable increase in computational cost.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00505.x
2005-11-02
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ClaerboutJ.1992. Earth Soundings Analysis: Processing Versus Inversion . Blackwell Science Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ColeS. and KarrenbachM.1992. Least‐squares Kirchhoff migration . http://sepwww.stanford.edu/public/docs/75SEP‐75.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DuquetB., MarfutK.J. and DellingerJ.A.2000. Kirchhoff modelling, inversion for reflectivity, and subsurface illumination. Geophysics65, 1195 – 1209.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. NemethT., WuC. and SchusterG.1999. Least‐squares migration of incomplete reflection data. Geophysics64, 208 – 221.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. SchusterG.T.1996. Resolution limits for crosswell migration and traveltime tomography. Geophysical Journal International127, 427 – 440.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. StoltR. and BensonA.1986. Seismic Migration: Theory and Practice . Handbook of Geophysical Exploration Vol. 5. Geophysical Press, London .
    [Google Scholar]
  7. SunH. and SchusterG.2000. Wave‐path migration versus Kirchhoff migration: 3‐D prestack examples. 70th SEG meeting, Calgary , Canada , Expanded Abstracts, 977 – 980.
  8. SunH. and SchusterG.2001. 2‐D wave‐path migration. Geophysics66, 1528 – 1537.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00505.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00505.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error