1887
Volume 54, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A field measurement of fracture compliance is described. The aim was to determine how compliance scales with fracture size and, specifically, how laboratory measurements of fracture compliance compared with field estimates from sonic and seismic data. A test site was constructed, consisting of three 40 m vertical boreholes drilled in the floor of a Carboniferous Limestone quarry. Detailed knowledge of the rocks in the test area was obtained from core analysis, wireline logging and local area fracture mapping. Seismic cross‐hole surveys were performed using a sparker source with a dominant frequency of 2000 Hz and hydrophone receivers. The rocks had a compressional‐wave velocity anisotropy of 10%, which was attributed to the presence of predominantly horizontal, partially open fractures. Estimates of normal fracture compliance within a range from 2.5 × 10−13 m/Pa to 3.5 × 10−12 m/Pa were obtained from both the cross‐hole data and the sonic‐log data. This is an order of magnitude greater than values obtained from laboratory experiments which are reported elsewhere.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00530.x
2006-04-12
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ChapmanM.2003. Frequency‐dependent anisotropy due to meso‐scale fractures in the presence of equant porosity. Geophysical Prospecting51, 369–379.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ChapmanM., MaultzschS., LiuE. and Xiang YangLi2003. The effect of fluid saturation in an anisotropic multi‐scale equant porosity model. Journal of Applied Geophysics54, 191–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CoatesR.T. and SchoenbergM.1995. Finite‐difference modelling of faults and fractures. Geophysics60, 1514–1526.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CrampinS. and ChastinS.2003. A review of shear wave splitting in the crack‐critical crust. Geophysical Journal International155, 221–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. HallS.A. and KendallJ.‐M.2003. Fracture characterization at Valhall: Application of P‐wave amplitude variation with offset and amplitude (AVOA) analysis to a 3D ocean bottom dataset. Geophysics68, 1150–1160.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HerwangerJ.V., WorthingtonM.H., LubbeR., BinleyA. and KhazanehdariJ.2004. A comparison of cross‐hole electrical and seismic data in fractured rock. Geophysical Prospecting52, 109–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HorneS.A., SlaterC.P., MalekS.A., HillA. and WijnandsF.2000. Walkaround VSPs for fractured reservoir characterisation. 70th SEG Meeting, Calgary, Canada, Expanded Abstracts, RC1, 1401–1404.
  8. HsuK., EsmersoyC. and SchoenbergM.1988. Seismic velocities and anisotropy from high‐resolution sonic logs. 58th SEG Meeting, Anaheim, USA, Expanded Abstracts, DEV 12, 114–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HudsonJ.A.1980. Overall properties of a cracked solid. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society88, 371–384.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HudsonJ.A.1981. Wave speeds and attenuation of elastic waves in material containing cracks. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society64, 133–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HudsonJ.A. and HarrisonJ.P.1997. Engineering Rock Mechanics: an Introduction to the Principles . Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine. University of London , UK .
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HudsonJ.A., LiuE. and CrampinS.1997. The mean transmission properties of a fault with imperfect facial contact. Geophysical Journal International129, 720–726.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. JakobsenM. and HudsonJ.A.2003. Visco‐elastic waves in rock‐like composites. Studies in Geophysics and Geodesy47, 793–826.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KingM.S., MyerL.R. and RezowalliJ.J.1986. Experimental studies of elastic‐wave propagation in a columnar‐jointed rock mass. Geophysical Prospecting34, 1185–1199.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. KingM.S. and Shams‐KhanshirM.1998. Petrophysics studies of sedimentary rocks from a cross‐hole seismic test site. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences35, 279–289.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KraghE., ChapmanC., EmsleyS. and DoddsK.1996. Anisotropic traveltime tomography in a hard‐rock environment. First Break14, 391–397.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LiuE., MaultzschS., ChapmanM., Xiang Yang Li QueenJ.H. and ZhangZ.2003. Frequency‐dependent seismic anisotropy and its implication for estimating fracture size in low porosity reservoirs. The Leading Edge22, 662–665.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LubbeR.2005. A field and laboratory investigation of the compliance of fractured rock . DPhil Thesis, Oxford University , UK .
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MaultzschS., ChapmanM., LiuE. and Xiang YangLi2003. Modelling frequency‐dependent seismic anisotropy in fluid‐saturated rock with aligned fractures: implication of fracture size estimation from anisotropic measurements. Geophysical Prospecting51, 381–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MoosD. and ZobackM.D.1983. In situ studies of velocity in fractured crystalline rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research88, 2345–2358.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MuellerM.1992. Using shear waves to predict lateral variability in vertical fracture intensity. The Leading Edge11, 29–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. MyerL.R., HopkinsD., PetersonJ.E. and CookN.G.W.1995. Seismic wave propagation across multiple fractures. In: Fractured and Jointed Rock Masses (eds L. R.Myer , C.‐F.Tsang , N. G. W.Cook and R. E.Goodman ), pp. 105–109. Balkema.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. NelsonR.A.2001. Geological Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs . Gulf Professional.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. PointerT., LiuE. and HudsonJ.A.2000. Seismic wave propagation in cracked porous media. Geophysical Journal International142, 199–231.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. PrattR.G. and ChapmanC.P.1992. Traveltime tomography in anisotropic media – II. application. Geophysical Journal International109, 20–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. PrattR.G., McGaugheyW.G. and ChapmanC.H.1993. Anisotropic velocity tomography: a case study in near surface rock mass. Geophysics58, 1748–1763.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. PriceN.J. and CosgroveJ.W.1990. Analysis of Geological Structures . Cambridge .
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pyrak‐NolteL.J., MyerL.R. and CookN.G.W.1990. Transmission of seismic waves across natural fractures. Journal of Geophysical Research95, 8617–8638.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. QueenJ.H.
    & RizerW.D. 1990. An integrated study of seismic anisotropy and the natural fracture system at the Conoco borehole test facility, Kay County, Oklahoma. Journal of Geophysical Research95, 11255–11273.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. SchoenbergM.1980. Elastic wave behaviour across linear slip interfaces. Journal of the Acoustical Society America68, 1516–1521.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. SchoenbergM. and SayersC.M.1995. Seismic anisotropy of fractured rock. Geophysics60, 204–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. SmithR.L. and GarrityJ.P.2001. Cracking the fractures – seismic anisotropy in an offshore reservoir. The Leading Edge20, 18–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. TodS.R.2001. The effects on seismic waves of interconnected nearly aligned cracks. Geophysical Journal International146, 249–263.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. ToomeyA. and BeanC.J.2000. Numerical simulation of seismic waves using a discrete particle scheme. Geophysical Journal International141, 595–604.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. ToomeyA., BeanC.J. and ScottiO.2002. Fracture properties from seismic data – a numerical investigation. Geophysical Research Letters29 (4), doi: DOI: 10.1029/2001GL013867.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. VlastosS., LiuE., MainI.G. and LiX.Y.2003. Numerical simulation of wave propagation in media with discrete distributions of fractures: effects of fracture sizes and spatial distributions. Geophysical Journal International152, 649–668.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. WorthingtonM.H. and HudsonJ.A.2000. Fault properties from seismic Q. Geophysical Journal International143, 937–944.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. XuS. and KingM.S.1992. Modelling the elastic and hydraulic properties of fractured rocks. Marine and Petroleum Geology9, 155–166.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00530.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00530.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error